CentOS Linux 8 [TuxCare] 安全性更新：bpftool / kernel / kernel-core / kernel-cross-headers / etc多個漏洞 （CENTOS-STREAM8：CLSA-2026：1777614769）
high Nessus Plugin ID 361340
語言:
概要
CentOS Linux 主機缺少一個或多個安全性更新。說明
CentOS Linux 8 主機安裝的套件會受到 TuxCare CENTOS-STREAM8：CLSA-2026：1777614769 公告中提及的多個弱點影響。- 已解決 Linux 核心中的下列弱點：asix: fix uninit-value in asix_mdio_read() asix_read_cmd() may read less than sizeof(smsr) bytes and in this case smsr will be uninitialized. Fail log: BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in asix_check_host_enable drivers/net/usb/asix_common.c:82 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in asix_check_host_enable drivers/net/usb/asix_common.c:82 [inline] drivers/net/usb/asix_common.c:497 BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in asix_mdio_read+0x3c1/0xb00 drivers/net/usb/asix_common.c:497 drivers/net/usb/asix_common.c:497 asix_check_host_enable drivers/net/usb/asix_common.c:82 [inline] asix_check_host_enable drivers/net/usb/asix_common.c:82 [inline] drivers/net/usb/asix_common.c:497 asix_mdio_read+0x3c1/0xb00 drivers/net/usb/asix_common.c:497 drivers/net/usb/asix_common.c:497 (CVE-2021-47101)
- 已解決 Linux 核心中的下列弱點：NFSD: Protect against send buffer overflow in NFSv2 READ Since before the git era, NFSD has conserved the number of pages held by each nfsd thread by combining the RPC receive and send buffers into a single array of pages. This works because there are no cases where an operation needs a large RPC Call message and a large RPC Reply at the same time. Once an RPC Call has been received, svc_process() updates svc_rqst::rq_res to describe the part of rq_pages that can be used for constructing the Reply. This means that the send buffer (rq_res) shrinks when the received RPC record containing the RPC Call is large. A client can force this shrinkage on TCP by sending a correctly- formed RPC Call header contained in an RPC record that is excessively large. The full maximum payload size cannot be constructed in that case. (CVE-2022-50410)
- 已解決 Linux 核心中的下列弱點：scsi: libsas: Fix use-after-free bug in smp_execute_task_sg() When executing SMP task failed, the smp_execute_task_sg() calls del_timer() to delete slow_task->timer. However, if the timer handler sas_task_internal_timedout() is running, the del_timer() in smp_execute_task_sg() will not stop it and a UAF will happen. The process is shown below:
(thread 1) | (thread 2) smp_execute_task_sg() | sas_task_internal_timedout() ... | del_timer() | ... | ...
sas_free_task(task) | kfree(task->slow_task) //FREE| | task->slow_task->... //USE Fix by calling del_timer_sync() in smp_execute_task_sg(), which makes sure the timer handler have finished before the task->slow_task is deallocated. (CVE-2022-50422)
- 已解決 Linux 核心中的下列弱點：ext4: fix use-after-free in ext4_orphan_cleanup I caught a issue as follows:
================================================================== BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in
__list_add_valid+0x28/0x1a0 Read of size 8 at addr ffff88814b13f378 by task mount/710 CPU: 1 PID: 710 Comm: mount Not tainted 6.1.0-rc3-next #370 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x73/0x9f print_report+0x25d/0x759 kasan_report+0xc0/0x120 __asan_load8+0x99/0x140 __list_add_valid+0x28/0x1a0 ext4_orphan_cleanup+0x564/0x9d0 [ext4] __ext4_fill_super+0x48e2/0x5300 [ext4] ext4_fill_super+0x19f/0x3a0 [ext4] get_tree_bdev+0x27b/0x450 ext4_get_tree+0x19/0x30 [ext4] vfs_get_tree+0x49/0x150 path_mount+0xaae/0x1350 do_mount+0xe2/0x110 __x64_sys_mount+0xf0/0x190 do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd </TASK> [...] ================================================================== Above issue may happen as follows:
------------------------------------- ext4_fill_super ext4_orphan_cleanup --- loop1: assume last_orphan is 12 --- list_add(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_orphan, &EXT4_SB(sb)->s_orphan) ext4_truncate --> return 0 ext4_inode_attach_jinode --> return -ENOMEM iput(inode) --> free inode<12> --- loop2: last_orphan is still 12 --- list_add(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_orphan, &EXT4_SB(sb)->s_orphan); // use inode<12> and trigger UAF To solve this issue, we need to propagate the return value of ext4_inode_attach_jinode() appropriately.
(CVE-2022-50673)
- 已解決 Linux 核心中的下列弱點：VMCI: check context->notify_page after call to get_user_pages_fast() to avoid GPF The call to get_user_pages_fast() in vmci_host_setup_notify() can return NULL context->notify_page causing a GPF. To avoid GPF check if context->notify_page == NULL and return error if so. general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xe0009d1000000060: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI KASAN: maybe wild-memory-access in range [0x0005088000000300-0x0005088000000307] CPU: 2 PID: 26180 Comm: repro_34802241 Not tainted 6.1.0-rc4 #1 Hardware name: Red Hat KVM, BIOS 1.15.0-2.module+el8.6.0 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:vmci_ctx_check_signal_notify+0x91/0xe0 Call Trace:
<TASK> vmci_host_unlocked_ioctl+0x362/0x1f40 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x1a1/0x230 do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd (CVE-2023-53259)
請注意，Nessus 並未測試這些問題，而是僅依據應用程式自我報告的版本號碼作出判斷。
解決方案
根據 TuxCare 公告 CENTOS-STREAM8：CLSA-2026：1777614769 中的指引更新受影響的套件。另請參閱
Plugin 詳細資訊
嚴重性: High
ID: 361340
檔案名稱: tuxcare_centos_8_CLSA-2026-1777614769.nasl
版本: 1.2
類型: Local
代理程式: unix
已發布: 2026/10/1
已更新: 2026/10/2
支援的感應器: Continuous Assessment, Nessus Agent, Tenable Cloud Security, Tenable Self-Hosted Container Security, Nessus
風險資訊
VPR
風險因素: Critical
分數: 9.5
百分位數: 99.87
Vendor
Vendor Severity: Important
CVSS v2
風險因素: Medium
基本分數: 6.8
時間性分數: 5.9
媒介: CVSS2#AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS 評分資料來源: CVE-2025-38685
CVSS v3
風險因素: High
基本分數: 7.8
時間性分數: 7.5
媒介: CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
時間媒介: CVSS:3.0/E:H/RL:O/RC:C
CVSS v4
風險因素: High
Base Score: 8.6
Threat Score: 8.6
Threat Vector: CVSS:4.0/E:A
Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
CVSS 評分資料來源: CVE-2026-31431
弱點資訊
必要的 KB 項目: Host/OS/extended-third-party, Host/local_checks_enabled, Host/CentOS/release, Host/CentOS/rpm-list
可被惡意程式利用: true
可輕鬆利用: Exploits are available
修補程式發佈日期: 2026/5/1
弱點發布日期: 2021/7/21
CISA 已知遭惡意利用弱點到期日: 2026/5/15
可惡意利用
Core Impact
Metasploit (Copy Fail AF_ALG + authencesn Page-Cache Write)
參考資訊
CVE: CVE-2021-47101, CVE-2022-50410, CVE-2022-50422, CVE-2022-50673, CVE-2023-53259, CVE-2024-35965, CVE-2024-35966, CVE-2024-35967, CVE-2025-22022, CVE-2025-38102, CVE-2025-38565, CVE-2025-38685, CVE-2026-23060, CVE-2026-23204, CVE-2026-31431, CVE-2026-43077
CLSA: 2026:1777614769