AlmaLinux 9.2 [TuxCare] 安全性更新：bpftool / kernel / kernel-abi-stablelists / kernel-core / etc多個弱點 （ALMALINUX9.2：CLSA-2026：1767864313）
high Nessus Plugin ID 360579
語言:
概要
AlmaLinux 主機缺少一或多個安全性更新。說明
AlmaLinux 9.2 主機已安裝的套件會受到 TuxCare ALMALINUX9.2：CLSA-2026：1767864313 公告中提及的多個弱點影響。- 已解決 Linux 核心中的下列弱點：firmware: arm_scpi: Ensure scpi_info is not assigned if the probe fails When scpi probe fails, at any point, we need to ensure that the scpi_info is not set and will remain NULL until the probe succeeds. If it is not taken care, then it could result use-after-free as the value is exported via get_scpi_ops() and could refer to a memory allocated via devm_kzalloc() but freed when the probe fails. (CVE-2022-50087)
- 已解決 Linux 核心中的下列弱點：wifi: rtlwifi: Fix global-out-of-bounds bug in _rtl8812ae_phy_set_txpower_limit() There is a global-out-of-bounds reported by KASAN: BUG:
KASAN: global-out-of-bounds in _rtl8812ae_eq_n_byte.part.0+0x3d/0x84 [rtl8821ae] Read of size 1 at addr ffffffffa0773c43 by task NetworkManager/411 CPU: 6 PID: 411 Comm: NetworkManager Tainted: G D 6.1.0-rc8+ #144 e15588508517267d37 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), Call Trace: <TASK> ...
kasan_report+0xbb/0x1c0 _rtl8812ae_eq_n_byte.part.0+0x3d/0x84 [rtl8821ae] rtl8821ae_phy_bb_config.cold+0x346/0x641 [rtl8821ae] rtl8821ae_hw_init+0x1f5e/0x79b0 [rtl8821ae] ...
</TASK> The root cause of the problem is that the comparison order of prate_section in
_rtl8812ae_phy_set_txpower_limit() is wrong. The _rtl8812ae_eq_n_byte() is used to compare the first n bytes of the two strings from tail to head, which causes the problem. In the
_rtl8812ae_phy_set_txpower_limit(), it was originally intended to meet this requirement by carefully designing the comparison order. For example, pregulation and pbandwidth are compared in order of length from small to large, first is 3 and last is 4. However, the comparison order of prate_section dose not obey such order requirement, therefore when prate_section is HT, when comparing from tail to head, it will lead to access out of bounds in _rtl8812ae_eq_n_byte(). As mentioned above, the
_rtl8812ae_eq_n_byte() has the same function as strcmp(), so just strcmp() is enough. Fix it by removing
_rtl8812ae_eq_n_byte() and use strcmp() barely. Although it can be fixed by adjusting the comparison order of prate_section, this may cause the value of rate_section to not be from 0 to 5. In addition, commit 21e4b0726dc6 not only moved driver from staging to regular tree, but also added setting txpower limit function during the driver config phase, so the problem was introduced by this commit. (CVE-2022-50279)
- 已解決 Linux 核心中的下列弱點：wifi: ath11k: fix monitor mode bringup crash When the interface is brought up in monitor mode, it leads to NULL pointer dereference crash. This crash happens when the packet type is extracted for a SKB. This extraction which is present in the received msdu delivery path,is not needed for the monitor ring packets since they are all RAW packets.
Hence appending the flags with RX_FLAG_ONLY_MONITOR to skip that extraction. Observed calltrace: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000064 Mem abort info: ESR = 0x0000000096000004 EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits SET = 0, FnV = 0 EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault Data abort info: ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004 CM = 0, WnR = 0 user pgtable:
4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000048517000 [0000000000000064] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000 Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP Modules linked in: ath11k_pci ath11k qmi_helpers CPU: 2 PID: 1781 Comm: napi/-271 Not tainted 6.1.0-rc5-wt-ath-656295-gef907406320c-dirty #6 Hardware name:
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. IPQ8074/AP-HK10-C2 (DT) pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : ath11k_hw_qcn9074_rx_desc_get_decap_type+0x34/0x60 [ath11k] lr :
ath11k_hw_qcn9074_rx_desc_get_decap_type+0x5c/0x60 [ath11k] sp : ffff80000ef5bb10 x29: ffff80000ef5bb10 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: ffff000007baafa0 x26: ffff000014a91ed0 x25: 0000000000000000 x24:
0000000000000000 x23: ffff800002b77378 x22: ffff000014a91ec0 x21: ffff000006c8d600 x20: 0000000000000000 x19: ffff800002b77740 x18: 0000000000000006 x17: 736564203634343a x16: 656e694c20657079 x15:
0000000000000143 x14: 00000000ffffffea x13: ffff80000ef5b8b8 x12: ffff80000ef5b8c8 x11: ffff80000a591d30 x10: ffff80000a579d40 x9 : c0000000ffffefff x8 : 0000000000000003 x7 : 0000000000017fe8 x6 :
ffff80000a579ce8 x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 3a35ec12ed7f8900 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 0000000000000052 Call trace: ath11k_hw_qcn9074_rx_desc_get_decap_type+0x34/0x60 [ath11k] ath11k_dp_rx_deliver_msdu.isra.42+0xa4/0x3d0 [ath11k] ath11k_dp_rx_mon_deliver.isra.43+0x2f8/0x458 [ath11k] ath11k_dp_rx_process_mon_rings+0x310/0x4c0 [ath11k] ath11k_dp_service_srng+0x234/0x338 [ath11k] ath11k_pcic_ext_grp_napi_poll+0x30/0xb8 [ath11k]
__napi_poll+0x5c/0x190 napi_threaded_poll+0xf0/0x118 kthread+0xf4/0x110 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 Tested-on:
QCN9074 hw1.0 PCI WLAN.HK.2.7.0.1-01744-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1 (CVE-2022-50627)
- 已解決 Linux 核心中的下列弱點：mm: hugetlb: fix UAF in hugetlb_handle_userfault The vma_lock and hugetlb_fault_mutex are dropped before handling userfault and reacquire them again after handle_userfault(), but reacquire the vma_lock could lead to UAF[1,2] due to the following race, hugetlb_fault hugetlb_no_page /*unlock vma_lock */ hugetlb_handle_userfault handle_userfault /* unlock mm->mmap_lock*/ vm_mmap_pgoff do_mmap mmap_region munmap_vma_range /* clean old vma */ /* lock vma_lock again <--- UAF */ /* unlock vma_lock */ Since the vma_lock will unlock immediately after hugetlb_handle_userfault(), let's drop the unneeded lock and unlock in hugetlb_handle_userfault() to fix the issue. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/[email protected]/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/[email protected]/ (CVE-2022-50630)
- 已解決 Linux 核心中的下列弱點：PCI: Fix pci_device_is_present() for VFs by checking PF pci_device_is_present() previously didn't work for VFs because it reads the Vendor and Device ID, which are 0xffff for VFs, which looks like they aren't present. Check the PF instead. Wei Gong reported that if virtio I/O is in progress when the driver is unbound or 0 is written to /sys/.../sriov_numvfs, the virtio I/O operation hangs, which may result in output like this: task:bash state:D stack: 0 pid: 1773 ppid: 1241 flags:0x00004002 Call Trace: schedule+0x4f/0xc0 blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait+0x69/0xa0 blk_mq_freeze_queue+0x1b/0x20 blk_cleanup_queue+0x3d/0xd0 virtblk_remove+0x3c/0xb0 [virtio_blk] virtio_dev_remove+0x4b/0x80 ... device_unregister+0x1b/0x60 unregister_virtio_device+0x18/0x30 virtio_pci_remove+0x41/0x80 pci_device_remove+0x3e/0xb0 This happened because pci_device_is_present(VF) returned false in virtio_pci_remove(), so it called virtio_break_device(). The broken vq meant that vring_interrupt() skipped the vq.callback() that would have completed the virtio I/O operation via virtblk_done(). [bhelgaas: commit log, simplify to always use pci_physfn(), add stable tag] (CVE-2022-50636)
請注意，Nessus 並未測試這些問題，而是僅依據應用程式自我報告的版本號碼作出判斷。
解決方案
根據 TuxCare 公告 ALMALINUX9.2：CLSA-2026：1767864313 中的指引更新受影響的套件。另請參閱
Plugin 詳細資訊
嚴重性: High
ID: 360579
檔案名稱: tuxcare_alma_linux_9.2_CLSA-2026-1767864313.nasl
版本: 1.1
類型: Local
已發布: 2026/10/1
已更新: 2026/10/1
支援的感應器: Continuous Assessment, Nessus Agent, Tenable Cloud Security, Tenable Self-Hosted Container Security, Nessus
風險資訊
VPR
風險因素: High
分數: 7.7
百分位數: 99.14
Vendor
Vendor Severity: Important
CVSS v2
風險因素: Medium
基本分數: 6.8
時間性分數: 5.3
媒介: CVSS2#AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS 評分資料來源: CVE-2025-39955
CVSS v3
風險因素: High
基本分數: 7.8
時間性分數: 7
媒介: CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
時間媒介: CVSS:3.0/E:P/RL:O/RC:C
弱點資訊
必要的 KB 項目: Host/OS/extended-third-party, Host/local_checks_enabled, Host/AlmaLinux/release, Host/AlmaLinux/rpm-list, Host/cpu
可被惡意程式利用: true
可輕鬆利用: Exploits are available
修補程式發佈日期: 2026/1/8
弱點發布日期: 2021/7/21
參考資訊
CVE: CVE-2022-50087, CVE-2022-50279, CVE-2022-50627, CVE-2022-50630, CVE-2022-50636, CVE-2022-50673, CVE-2023-53088, CVE-2023-53192, CVE-2023-53218, CVE-2023-53254, CVE-2023-53257, CVE-2023-53285, CVE-2023-53305, CVE-2023-53321, CVE-2023-53386, CVE-2023-53519, CVE-2023-53591, CVE-2023-53665, CVE-2023-53673, CVE-2023-53679, CVE-2023-53755, CVE-2023-53786, CVE-2023-53789, CVE-2023-53816, CVE-2023-53819, CVE-2023-53821, CVE-2023-53832, CVE-2023-53833, CVE-2023-53843, CVE-2024-44974, CVE-2024-53207, CVE-2024-53216, CVE-2025-22022, CVE-2025-38075, CVE-2025-38361, CVE-2025-38499, CVE-2025-38724, CVE-2025-39697, CVE-2025-39797, CVE-2025-39864, CVE-2025-39881, CVE-2025-39898, CVE-2025-39955, CVE-2025-39965, CVE-2025-39981, CVE-2025-40176, CVE-2025-40186
CLSA: 2026:1767864313