Linux Distros 未修補弱點:CVE-2024-35818

medium Nessus Plugin ID 228717

概要

Linux/Unix 主機上安裝的一個或多個套件存有弱點,供應商表示將不會修補。

說明

Linux/Unix 主機上安裝了一個或多個受到弱點影響的套件,且供應商未提供可用的修補程式。

- 在 Linux 核心中,已解決下列弱點: LoongArch: Define the __io_aw() hook as mmiowb() Commit fb24ea52f78e0d595852e (drivers: Remove explicit invocations of mmiowb()) remove all mmiowb() in drivers, but it says: NOTE: mmiowb() has only ever guaranteed ordering in conjunction with spin_unlock(). However, pairing each mmiowb() removal in this patch with the corresponding call to spin_unlock() is not at all trivial, so there is a small chance that this change may regress any drivers incorrectly relying on mmiowb() to order MMIO writes between CPUs using lock-free synchronisation. The mmio in radeon_ring_commit() is protected by a mutex rather than a spinlock, but in the mutex fastpath it behaves similar to spinlock. We can add mmiowb() calls in the radeon driver but the maintainer says he doesn't like such a workaround, and radeon is not the only example of mutex protected mmio. So we should extend the mmiowb tracking system from spinlock to mutex, and maybe other locking primitives. This is not easy and error prone, so we solve it in the architectural code, by simply defining the __io_aw() hook as mmiowb(). And we no longer need to override queued_spin_unlock() so use the generic definition. Without this, we get such an error when run 'glxgears' on weak ordering architectures such as LoongArch: radeon 0000:04:00.0: ring 0 stalled for more than 10324msec radeon 0000:04:00.0: ring 3 stalled for more than 10240msec radeon 0000:04:00.0: GPU lockup (current fence id 0x000000000001f412 last fence id 0x000000000001f414 on ring 3) radeon 0000:04:00.0: GPU lockup (current fence id 0x000000000000f940 last fence id 0x000000000000f941 on ring 0) radeon 0000:04:00.0: scheduling IB failed (-35).
[drm:radeon_gem_va_ioctl [radeon]] *ERROR* Couldn't update BO_VA (-35) radeon 0000:04:00.0: scheduling IB failed (-35). [drm:radeon_gem_va_ioctl [radeon]] *ERROR* Couldn't update BO_VA (-35) radeon 0000:04:00.0:
scheduling IB failed (-35). [drm:radeon_gem_va_ioctl [radeon]] *ERROR* Couldn't update BO_VA (-35) radeon 0000:04:00.0: scheduling IB failed (-35). [drm:radeon_gem_va_ioctl [radeon]] *ERROR* Couldn't update BO_VA (-35) radeon 0000:04:00.0: scheduling IB failed (-35). [drm:radeon_gem_va_ioctl [radeon]] *ERROR* Couldn't update BO_VA (-35) radeon 0000:04:00.0: scheduling IB failed (-35). [drm:radeon_gem_va_ioctl [radeon]]
*ERROR* Couldn't update BO_VA (-35) radeon 0000:04:00.0: scheduling IB failed (-35).
[drm:radeon_gem_va_ioctl [radeon]] *ERROR* Couldn't update BO_VA (-35) (CVE-2024-35818)

請注意,Nessus 依賴供應商報告的套件存在。

解決方案

目前尚未有已知的解決方案。

Plugin 詳細資訊

嚴重性: Medium

ID: 228717

檔案名稱: unpatched_CVE_2024_35818.nasl

版本: 1.1

類型: local

代理程式: unix

系列: Misc.

已發布: 2025/3/5

已更新: 2025/3/5

支援的感應器: Nessus Agent, Nessus

風險資訊

VPR

風險因素: Low

分數: 3.6

CVSS v2

風險因素: Medium

基本分數: 4.6

時間性分數: 3.4

媒介: CVSS2#AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:C

CVSS 評分資料來源: CVE-2024-35818

CVSS v3

風險因素: Medium

基本分數: 5.5

時間性分數: 4.8

媒介: CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

時間媒介: CVSS:3.0/E:U/RL:O/RC:C

弱點資訊

必要的 KB 項目: Host/local_checks_enabled, Host/cpu, global_settings/vendor_unpatched

可輕鬆利用: No known exploits are available

弱點發布日期: 2024/5/17

參考資訊

CVE: CVE-2024-35818