Linux Distros 未修補弱點：CVE-2024-43892
medium Nessus Plugin ID 228674
語言:
概要
Linux/Unix 主機上安裝的一個或多個套件存有弱點，供應商表示將不會修補。說明
Linux/Unix 主機上安裝了一個或多個受到弱點影響的套件，且供應商未提供可用的修補程式。- 在 Linux 核心中，已解決下列弱點： memcg: protect concurrent access to mem_cgroup_idr Commit 73f576c04b94 (mm: memcontrol: fix cgroup creation failure after many small jobs) decoupled the memcg IDs from the CSS ID space to fix the cgroup creation failures. It introduced IDR to maintain the memcg ID space. The IDR depends on external synchronization mechanisms for modifications. For the mem_cgroup_idr, the idr_alloc() and idr_replace() happen within css callback and thus are protected through cgroup_mutex from concurrent modifications. However idr_remove() for mem_cgroup_idr was not protected against concurrency and can be run concurrently for different memcgs when they hit their refcnt to zero. Fix that. We have been seeing list_lru based kernel crashes at a low frequency in our fleet for a long time. These crashes were in different part of list_lru code including list_lru_add(), list_lru_del() and reparenting code. Upon further inspection, it looked like for a given object (dentry and inode), the super_block's list_lru didn't have list_lru_one for the memcg of that object. The initial suspicions were either the object is not allocated through kmem_cache_alloc_lru() or somehow memcg_list_lru_alloc() failed to allocate list_lru_one() for a memcg but returned success. No evidence were found for these cases.
Looking more deeply, we started seeing situations where valid memcg's id is not present in mem_cgroup_idr and in some cases multiple valid memcgs have same id and mem_cgroup_idr is pointing to one of them. So, the most reasonable explanation is that these situations can happen due to race between multiple idr_remove() calls or race between idr_alloc()/idr_replace() and idr_remove(). These races are causing multiple memcgs to acquire the same ID and then offlining of one of them would cleanup list_lrus on the system for all of them. Later access from other memcgs to the list_lru cause crashes due to missing list_lru_one. (CVE-2024-43892)
請注意，Nessus 依賴供應商報告的套件存在。
解決方案
目前尚未有已知的解決方案。Plugin 詳細資訊
嚴重性: Medium
ID: 228674
檔案名稱: unpatched_CVE_2024_43892.nasl
版本: 1.2
類型: local
代理程式: unix
系列: Misc.
已發布: 2025/3/5
已更新: 2025/3/10
支援的感應器: Nessus Agent, Nessus
風險資訊
VPR
風險因素: Medium
分數: 4.4
CVSS v2
風險因素: Low
基本分數: 3.8
時間性分數: 2.8
媒介: CVSS2#AV:L/AC:H/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:C
CVSS 評分資料來源: CVE-2024-43892
CVSS v3
風險因素: Medium
基本分數: 4.7
時間性分數: 4.1
媒介: CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
時間媒介: CVSS:3.0/E:U/RL:O/RC:C
弱點資訊
必要的 KB 項目: Host/local_checks_enabled, Host/cpu, global_settings/vendor_unpatched
可輕鬆利用: No known exploits are available
弱點發布日期: 2024/8/26
參考資訊
CVE: CVE-2024-43892