Linux Distros 未修補弱點：CVE-2022-49647
high Nessus Plugin ID 227309
語言:
概要
Linux/Unix 主機上安裝的一個或多個套件存有弱點，供應商表示將不會修補。說明
Linux/Unix 主機上安裝了一個或多個受到弱點影響的套件，且供應商未提供可用的修補程式。- 在 Linux 核心中，已解決下列弱點： cgroup: Use separate src/dst nodes when preloading css_sets for migration Each cset (css_set) is pinned by its tasks. When we're moving tasks around across csets for a migration, we need to hold the source and destination csets to ensure that they don't go away while we're moving tasks about. This is done by linking cset->mg_preload_node on either the mgctx->preloaded_src_csets or mgctx->preloaded_dst_csets list. Using the same cset->mg_preload_node for both the src and dst lists was deemed okay as a cset can't be both the source and destination at the same time. Unfortunately, this overloading becomes problematic when multiple tasks are involved in a migration and some of them are identity noop migrations while others are actually moving across cgroups. For example, this can happen with the following sequence on cgroup1: #1> mkdir -p /sys/fs/cgroup/misc/a/b #2> echo $$ > /sys/fs/cgroup/misc/a/cgroup.procs #3> RUN_A_COMMAND_WHICH_CREATES_MULTIPLE_THREADS & #4> PID=$! #5> echo $PID > /sys/fs/cgroup/misc/a/b/tasks #6> echo $PID > /sys/fs/cgroup/misc/a/cgroup.procs the process including the group leader back into a. In this final migration, non-leader threads would be doing identity migration while the group leader is doing an actual one. After #3, let's say the whole process was in cset A, and that after #4, the leader moves to cset B. Then, during #6, the following happens: 1.
cgroup_migrate_add_src() is called on B for the leader. 2. cgroup_migrate_add_src() is called on A for the other threads. 3. cgroup_migrate_prepare_dst() is called. It scans the src list. 4. It notices that B wants to migrate to A, so it tries to A to the dst list but realizes that its ->mg_preload_node is already busy. 5. and then it notices A wants to migrate to A as it's an identity migration, it culls it by list_del_init()'ing its ->mg_preload_node and putting references accordingly. 6. The rest of migration takes place with B on the src list but nothing on the dst list. This means that A isn't held while migration is in progress. If all tasks leave A before the migration finishes and the incoming task pins it, the cset will be destroyed leading to use-after-free. This is caused by overloading cset->mg_preload_node for both src and dst preload lists. We wanted to exclude the cset from the src list but ended up inadvertently excluding it from the dst list too. This patch fixes the issue by separating out cset->mg_preload_node into ->mg_src_preload_node and ->mg_dst_preload_node, so that the src and dst preloadings don't interfere with each other. (CVE-2022-49647)
請注意，Nessus 依賴供應商報告的套件存在。
解決方案
目前尚未有已知的解決方案。Plugin 詳細資訊
嚴重性: High
ID: 227309
檔案名稱: unpatched_CVE_2022_49647.nasl
版本: 1.1
類型: local
代理程式: unix
系列: Misc.
已發布: 2025/3/5
已更新: 2025/3/5
支援的感應器: Nessus Agent, Nessus
風險資訊
VPR
風險因素: Medium
分數: 6.7
CVSS v2
風險因素: Medium
基本分數: 5.4
時間性分數: 4
媒介: CVSS2#AV:L/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:C
CVSS 評分資料來源: CVE-2022-49647
CVSS v3
風險因素: High
基本分數: 7.8
時間性分數: 6.8
媒介: CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
時間媒介: CVSS:3.0/E:U/RL:O/RC:C
弱點資訊
必要的 KB 項目: Host/local_checks_enabled, Host/cpu, global_settings/vendor_unpatched
可輕鬆利用: No known exploits are available
弱點發布日期: 2025/2/26
參考資訊
CVE: CVE-2022-49647