Linux Distros 未修補弱點：CVE-2022-48853
medium Nessus Plugin ID 225166
語言:
概要
Linux/Unix 主機上安裝的一個或多個套件存有弱點，供應商表示將不會修補。說明
Linux/Unix 主機上安裝了一個或多個受到弱點影響的套件，且供應商未提供可用的修補程式。- 在 Linux 核心中，已解決下列弱點： swiotlb: fix info leak with DMA_FROM_DEVICE The problem I'm addressing was discovered by the LTP test covering cve-2018-1000204. A short description of what happens follows: 1) The test case issues a command code 00 (TEST UNIT READY) via the SG_IO interface with: dxfer_len == 524288, dxdfer_dir == SG_DXFER_FROM_DEV and a corresponding dxferp.
The peculiar thing about this is that TUR is not reading from the device. 2) In sg_start_req() the invocation of blk_rq_map_user() effectively bounces the user-space buffer. As if the device was to transfer into it. Since commit a45b599ad808 (scsi: sg: allocate with __GFP_ZERO in sg_build_indirect()) we make sure this first bounce buffer is allocated with GFP_ZERO. 3) For the rest of the story we keep ignoring that we have a TUR, so the device won't touch the buffer we prepare as if the we had a DMA_FROM_DEVICE type of situation. My setup uses a virtio-scsi device and the buffer allocated by SG is mapped by the function virtqueue_add_split() which uses DMA_FROM_DEVICE for the in sgs (here scatter-gather and not scsi generics). This mapping involves bouncing via the swiotlb (we need swiotlb to do virtio in protected guest like s390 Secure Execution, or AMD SEV). 4) When the SCSI TUR is done, we first copy back the content of the second (that is swiotlb) bounce buffer (which most likely contains some previous IO data), to the first bounce buffer, which contains all zeros. Then we copy back the content of the first bounce buffer to the user-space buffer. 5) The test case detects that the buffer, which it zero-initialized, ain't all zeros and fails. One can argue that this is an swiotlb problem, because without swiotlb we leak all zeros, and the swiotlb should be transparent in a sense that it does not affect the outcome (if all other participants are well behaved). Copying the content of the original buffer into the swiotlb buffer is the only way I can think of to make swiotlb transparent in such scenarios. So let's do just that if in doubt, but allow the driver to tell us that the whole mapped buffer is going to be overwritten, in which case we can preserve the old behavior and avoid the performance impact of the extra bounce. (CVE-2022-48853)
請注意，Nessus 依賴供應商報告的套件存在。
解決方案
目前尚未有已知的解決方案。Plugin 詳細資訊
嚴重性: Medium
ID: 225166
檔案名稱: unpatched_CVE_2022_48853.nasl
版本: 1.1
類型: local
代理程式: unix
系列: Misc.
已發布: 2025/3/5
已更新: 2025/3/5
支援的感應器: Nessus Agent, Nessus
風險資訊
VPR
風險因素: Medium
分數: 4.4
CVSS v2
風險因素: Medium
基本分數: 4.6
時間性分數: 3.4
媒介: CVSS2#AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:N/A:N
CVSS 評分資料來源: CVE-2022-48853
CVSS v3
風險因素: Medium
基本分數: 5.5
時間性分數: 4.8
媒介: CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
時間媒介: CVSS:3.0/E:U/RL:O/RC:C
弱點資訊
必要的 KB 項目: Host/local_checks_enabled, Host/cpu, global_settings/vendor_unpatched
可輕鬆利用: No known exploits are available
弱點發布日期: 2024/7/16
參考資訊
CVE: CVE-2022-48853