Linux/Unix 主機上安裝了一個或多個受到弱點影響的套件，且廠商未提供可用的修補程式。

  - ALSA： usb-audio：修正 snd_usbmidi_novation_output（） 中的 OOB 寫入 snd_usbmidi_novation_output（） 在 transfer_buffer[0..1] 處佈置一個兩位元組的標頭，並將 &transfer_buffer[2] 連同 ep->max_transfer - 2 長度傳遞到 snd_rawmidi_transmit（）：count = snd_rawmidi_transmit（ep->ports[0].substream， &transfer_buffer[2]， ep->max_transfer - 2）;ep->max_transfer 透過 usb_maxpacket（） 來自輸出端點的 wMaxPacketSize。格式錯誤或惡意裝置可以通告 wMaxPacketSize 為 1 的大量 OUT 端點 - USB 核心只會向下限制此值 - 因此 ep->max_transfer 會變成 1，而 count 引數會變成 -1。snd_rawmidi_transmit（） 將負計數傳遞給
    __snd_rawmidi_transmit_peek（），其中 if （count1 > count） count1 = count 使 count1 為負數;
    get_aligned_size（） 對位元組資料流子資料流保持負數，因此下列 memcpy（buffer， ...， count1） 以 （size_t）-1 長度執行，並寫入遠遠超出使用 usb_alloc_coherent（ep->max_transfer） 配置的傳輸緩衝區。這與提交 0970274613fb 中針對 snd_usbmidi_akai_output（） 修正的錯誤類別相同 （ALSA：usb-audio：修正 snd_usbmidi_akai_output（）） 中的 OOB 寫入）;Novation 輸出例程無人看守。當端點無法保留兩個位元組標頭加上至少一個承載位元組時，請退出。（CVE-2026-80829）

請注意，Nessus 的判定取決於廠商所報告的套件是否存在。

CentOS Linux 7 主機已安裝的套件會受到 TuxCare CENTOS7：CLSA-2026：1792234299 公告中提及的多個弱點影響。

  - 在 Linux 核心 5.18.14 以及之前版本中，net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c 中的 nfqnl_mangle 允許遠端攻擊者造成拒絕服務 (錯誤)，這是因爲當 nf_queue 判定包含一個位元組的 nfta_payload 屬性時，skb_pull 可能遇到負數 skb->len。(CVE-2022-36946)

  - 已解決 Linux 核心中的下列弱點：wifi: iwlwifi: mvm: Fix a memory corruption issue A few lines above, space is kzalloc()'ed for: sizeof(struct iwl_nvm_data) + sizeof(struct ieee80211_channel) + sizeof(struct ieee80211_rate) 'mvm->nvm_data' is a 'struct iwl_nvm_data', so it is fine. At the end of this structure, there is the 'channels' flex array. Each element is of type 'struct ieee80211_channel'. So only 1 element is allocated in this array. When doing:
    mvm->nvm_data->bands[0].channels = mvm->nvm_data->channels; We point at the first element of the 'channels' flex array. So this is fine. However, when doing: mvm->nvm_data->bands[0].bitrates = (void
    *)((u8 *)mvm->nvm_data->channels + 1); because of the (u8 *) cast, we add only 1 to the address of the beginning of the flex array. It is likely that we want point at the 'struct ieee80211_rate' allocated just after. Remove the spurious casting so that the pointer arithmetic works as expected. (CVE-2023-52531)

  - 已解決 Linux 核心中的下列弱點：KVM: x86: Don't (re)check L1 intercepts when completing userspace I/O When completing emulation of instruction that generated a userspace exit for I/O, don't recheck L1 intercepts as KVM has already finished that phase of instruction execution, i.e. has already committed to allowing L2 to perform I/O. If L1 (or host userspace) modifies the I/O permission bitmaps during the exit to userspace, KVM will treat the access as being intercepted despite already having emulated the I/O access. Pivot on EMULTYPE_NO_DECODE to detect that KVM is completing emulation. Of the three users of EMULTYPE_NO_DECODE, only complete_emulated_io() (the intended recipient) can reach the code in question. gp_interception()'s use is mutually exclusive with is_guest_mode(), and complete_emulated_insn_gp() unconditionally pairs EMULTYPE_NO_DECODE with EMULTYPE_SKIP. The bad behavior was detected by a syzkaller program that toggles port I/O interception during the userspace I/O exit, ultimately resulting in a WARN on vcpu->arch.pio.count being non-zero due to KVM no completing emulation of the I/O instruction. WARNING: CPU: 23 PID: 1083 at arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:8039 emulator_pio_in_out+0x154/0x170 [kvm] Modules linked in: kvm_intel kvm irqbypass CPU: 23 UID: 1000 PID: 1083 Comm: repro Not tainted 6.16.0-rc5-c1610d2d66b1-next-vm #74 NONE Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 RIP: 0010:emulator_pio_in_out+0x154/0x170 [kvm] PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> kvm_fast_pio+0xd6/0x1d0 [kvm] vmx_handle_exit+0x149/0x610 [kvm_intel] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0xda8/0x1ac0 [kvm] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x244/0x8c0 [kvm]
    __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8a/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x5d/0xc60 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 </TASK> (CVE-2025-40026)

  - 已解決 Linux 核心中的下列弱點：Bluetooth: btusb: fix use-after-free on registration failure Make sure to release the sibling interfaces in case controller registration fails to avoid use-after-free and double-free when they are eventually disconnected. This issue was reported by Sashiko while reviewing a fix for a wakeup source leak in the btusb probe errors paths. (CVE-2026-64471)

  - 已解決 Linux 核心中的下列弱點：ALSA: firewire: isight: bound the sample count to the packet payload isight_packet() takes the frame count from the device iso packet and checks it only against the device claimed iso length. count = be32_to_cpu(payload->sample_count); if (likely(count <= (length - 16) / 4)) isight_samples(isight, payload->samples, count); length is the iso header data_length. It can be up to 0xffff. So the gate allows a count up to about 16379. isight_samples() then copies count frames out of payload->samples into the PCM DMA buffer. payload->samples holds only 2 * MAX_FRAMES_PER_PACKET values. The device multiplexes two samples per frame. A count past MAX_FRAMES_PER_PACKET reads past the payload. A count past the buffer size writes past runtime->dma_area.
    The smallest PCM buffer is larger than MAX_FRAMES_PER_PACKET. Bounding the count to MAX_FRAMES_PER_PACKET keeps both the read and the write in range. A malicious or faulty Apple iSight on the FireWire bus reaches this during a normal capture. Add the MAX_FRAMES_PER_PACKET bound to the gate. (CVE-2026-64483)

請注意，Nessus 並未測試這些問題，而是僅依據應用程式自我報告的版本號碼作出判斷。

CentOS Linux 6 主機安裝的套件會受到 TuxCare CENTOS6：CLSA-2026：1791949745 公告中提及的多個弱點影響。

  - 已解決 Linux 核心中的下列弱點：HID: core: zero-initialize the report buffer Since the report buffer is used by all kinds of drivers in various ways, let's zero-initialize it during allocation to make sure that it can't be ever used to leak kernel memory via specially-crafted report. (CVE-2024-50302)

  - 已解決 Linux 核心中的下列弱點：ALSA: usb-audio: Fix potential out-of-bound accesses for Extigy and Mbox devices A bogus device can provide a bNumConfigurations value that exceeds the initial value used in usb_get_configuration for allocating dev->config. This can lead to out-of-bounds accesses later, e.g. in usb_destroy_configuration. (CVE-2024-53197)

  - 已解決 Linux 核心中的下列弱點：smb: client: reject userspace cifs.spnego descriptions cifs.spnego key descriptions contain authority-bearing fields such as pid, uid, creduid, and upcall_target that cifs.upcall treats as kernel-originating inputs. However, userspace can also create keys of this type through request_key(2) or add_key(2), allowing those fields to be supplied without CIFS origin. Only accept cifs.spnego descriptions while CIFS is using its private spnego_cred to request the key. (CVE-2026-46243)

  - 已解決 Linux 核心中的下列弱點：Bluetooth: serialize accept_q access bt_sock_poll() walks the accept queue without synchronization, while child teardown can unlink the same socket and drop its last reference. The unsynchronized accept queue walk has existed since the initial Bluetooth import. Protect accept_q with a dedicated lock for queue updates and polling. Also rework bt_accept_dequeue() to take temporary child references under the queue lock before dropping it and locking the child socket. (CVE-2026-52918)

  - 已解決 Linux 核心中的下列弱點：netfilter: bridge: make ebt_snat ARP rewrite writable The ebtables SNAT target keeps the Ethernet source address rewrite behind skb_ensure_writable(skb, 0). This is intentional: at the bridge ebtables hooks the Ethernet header is addressed through skb_mac_header()/eth_hdr(), while skb->data points at the Ethernet payload. Asking skb_ensure_writable() for ETH_HLEN bytes would check the payload, not the Ethernet header, and would reintroduce the small packet regression fixed by commit 63137bc5882a. However, the optional ARP sender hardware address rewrite is different. It writes through skb_store_bits() at an offset relative to skb->data: skb_store_bits(skb, sizeof(struct arphdr), info->mac, ETH_ALEN) skb_header_pointer() only safely reads the ARP header; it does not make the later sender hardware address range writable. If that range is still held in a nonlinear skb fragment backed by a splice-imported file page, skb_store_bits() maps the frag page and copies the new MAC address directly into it. Ensure the ARP SHA range is writable before reading the ARP header and before calling skb_store_bits(). (CVE-2026-53266)

請注意，Nessus 並未測試這些問題，而是僅依據應用程式自我報告的版本號碼作出判斷。

遠端 Debian 12 主機安裝的套件會受到 dla-4777 公告中提及的多個弱點影響。

    - Bonaccorso debian-lts@lists.debian.org------------------------------------------------------------------------- https://www.debian.org/lts/security/Salvatore Debian LTS 公告 DLA-4777-1 2026 年 9 月 8 日https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------

    套件：linux 版本： 6.1.187-1 CVE ID： CVE-2023-53706 CVE-2023-54141 CVE-2023-54263 CVE-2024-38620 CVE-2024-46754 CVE-2024-58094 CVE-2024-58095 CVE-2025-22104 CVE-2025-38117 CVE-2025-38203 CVE-2025-38206 CVE-2025-38237 CVE-2025-38616 CVE-2025-39833 CVE-2025-39901 CVE-2025-39925 CVE-2025-40054 CVE-2025-40064 CVE-2025-40102 CVE-2025-40139 CVE-2025-40168 CVE-2025-40206 CVE-2025-40307 CVE-2025-68794 CVE-2026-23394 CVE-2026-31419 CVE-2026-43491 CVE-2026-45963 CVE-2026-46111 CVE-2026-46158 CVE-2026-46170 CVE-2026-46266 CVE-2026-53089 CVE-2026-53090 CVE-2026-53361 CVE-2026-64082 CVE-2026-64139 CVE-2026-64192 CVE-2026-64270 CVE-2026-64272 CVE-2026-64280 CVE-2026-64294 CVE-2026-64434 CVE-2026-64507 CVE-2026-64508 CVE-2026-64542 CVE-2026-64543 CVE-2026-64561 CVE-2026-64562 CVE-2026-64563 CVE-2026-64564 CVE-2026-64565 CVE-2026-64567 CVE-2026-64569 CVE-2026-64571 CVE-2026-64572 CVE-2026-64573 CVE-2026-64576 CVE-2026-64577 CVE-2026-64578 CVE-2026-64579 CVE-2026-64580 CVE-2026-64581 CVE-2026-64582 CVE-2026-64583 CVE-2026-64584 CVE-2026-64586 CVE-2026-64590 CVE-2026-68082 CVE-2026-68093 CVE-2026-68096 CVE-2026-68099 CVE-2026-68100 CVE-2026-68104 CVE-2026-68106 CVE-2026-68108 CVE-2026-68111 CVE-2026-68115 CVE-2026-68117 CVE-2026-68121 CVE-2026-68123 CVE-2026-68124 CVE-2026-68125 CVE-2026-68127 CVE-2026-68129 CVE-2026-68130 CVE-2026-68131 CVE-2026-68132 CVE-2026-68135 CVE-2026-68136 CVE-2026-68137 CVE-2026-68138 CVE-2026-68140 CVE-2026-68141 CVE-2026-68142 CVE-2026-68143 CVE-2026-68144 CVE-2026-68146 CVE-2026-68147 CVE-2026-68148 CVE-2026-68151 CVE-2026-68153 CVE-2026-68154 CVE-2026-68155 CVE-2026-68156 CVE-2026-68157 CVE-2026-68158 CVE-2026-68159 CVE-2026-68160 CVE-2026-68162 CVE-2026-68164 CVE-2026-68165 CVE-2026-68169 CVE-2026-68175 CVE-2026-68176 CVE-2026-68180 CVE-2026-68181 CVE-2026-68182 CVE-2026-68183 CVE-2026-68184 CVE-2026-68186 CVE-2026-68187 CVE-2026-68188 CVE-2026-68189 CVE-2026-68190 CVE-2026-68192 CVE-2026-68194 CVE-2026-68195 CVE-2026-68196 CVE-2026-68197 CVE-2026-68198 CVE-2026-68199 CVE-2026-68202 CVE-2026-68204 CVE-2026-68206 CVE-2026-68207 CVE-2026-68209 CVE-2026-68210 CVE-2026-68212 CVE-2026-68213 CVE-2026-68214 CVE-2026-68215 CVE-2026-68216 CVE-2026-68217 CVE-2026-68218 CVE-2026-68222 CVE-2026-68223 CVE-2026-68226 CVE-2026-68227 CVE-2026-68229 CVE-2026-68231 CVE-2026-68234 CVE-2026-68243 CVE-2026-68244 CVE-2026-68246 CVE-2026-68248 CVE-2026-68249 CVE-2026-68250 CVE-2026-68251 CVE-2026-68253 CVE-2026-68254 CVE-2026-68255 CVE-2026-68259 CVE-2026-68269 CVE-2026-68277 CVE-2026-68278 CVE-2026-68279 CVE-2026-68280 CVE-2026-68284 CVE-2026-68294 CVE-2026-68297 CVE-2026-68299 CVE-2026-68300 CVE-2026-68301 CVE-2026-68302 CVE-2026-68304 CVE-2026-68309 CVE-2026-68310 CVE-2026-68313 CVE-2026-68315 CVE-2026-68320 CVE-2026-68322 CVE-2026-68324 CVE-2026-68325 CVE-2026-68326 CVE-2026-68327 CVE-2026-68328 CVE-2026-68331 CVE-2026-68333 CVE-2026-68335 CVE-2026-68336 CVE-2026-68338 CVE-2026-68340 CVE-2026-68343 CVE-2026-68344 CVE-2026-68349 CVE-2026-68350 CVE-2026-68351 CVE-2026-68352 CVE-2026-68353 CVE-2026-68354 CVE-2026-68355 CVE-2026-68357 CVE-2026-68359 CVE-2026-68360 CVE-2026-68361 CVE-2026-68362 CVE-2026-68363 CVE-2026-68365 CVE-2026-68366 CVE-2026-68367 CVE-2026-68368 CVE-2026-68369 CVE-2026-68370 CVE-2026-68371 CVE-2026-68373 CVE-2026-68376 CVE-2026-68377 CVE-2026-68386 CVE-2026-68388 CVE-2026-68395 CVE-2026-68397 CVE-2026-68398 CVE-2026-68402 CVE-2026-68403 CVE-2026-68405 CVE-2026-68406 CVE-2026-68407 CVE-2026-68410 CVE-2026-68411 CVE-2026-68413 CVE-2026-68414 CVE-2026-68417 CVE-2026-68422 CVE-2026-68425 CVE-2026-68427 CVE-2026-68428 CVE-2026-68430 CVE-2026-68431 CVE-2026-68432 CVE-2026-68433 CVE-2026-68434 CVE-2026-68444 CVE-2026-68446 CVE-2026-68450 CVE-2026-68451 CVE-2026-68452 CVE-2026-68476 CVE-2026-68480 CVE-2026-72012 CVE-2026-72015 CVE-2026-72017 CVE-2026-72023 CVE-2026-72030 CVE-2026-72035 CVE-2026-72040 CVE-2026-72041 CVE-2026-72045 CVE-2026-72051 CVE-2026-72057 CVE-2026-72062 CVE-2026-72063 CVE-2026-72065 CVE-2026-72069 CVE-2026-72070 CVE-2026-72077 CVE-2026-72096 CVE-2026-72099 CVE-2026-72110 CVE-2026-72113 CVE-2026-72114 CVE-2026-72115 CVE-2026-72116 CVE-2026-72117 CVE-2026-72118 CVE-2026-72119 CVE-2026-72121 CVE-2026-72124 CVE-2026-72125 CVE-2026-72142 CVE-2026-72146 CVE-2026-72157 CVE-2026-72170 CVE-2026-72172 CVE-2026-72191 CVE-2026-72216 CVE-2026-72236 CVE-2026-72237 CVE-2026-72242 CVE-2026-72252 CVE-2026-72253 CVE-2026-72260 CVE-2026-72262 CVE-2026-72299 CVE-2026-72305 CVE-2026-72308 CVE-2026-72323 CVE-2026-72392 CVE-2026-74436 CVE-2026-74441 CVE-2026-74443 CVE-2026-74444 CVE-2026-74446 CVE-2026-74450 CVE-2026-74453 CVE-2026-74454 CVE-2026-74455 CVE-2026-74456 CVE-2026-74457 CVE-2026-74458 CVE-2026-74459 CVE-2026-74460 CVE-2026-74461 CVE-2026-74463 CVE-2026-74464 CVE-2026-74465 CVE-2026-74467 CVE-2026-74468 CVE-2026-74469 CVE-2026-74470 CVE-2026-74471 CVE-2026-74472 CVE-2026-74473 CVE-2026-74475 CVE-2026-74476 CVE-2026-74478 CVE-2026-74479 CVE-2026-74480 CVE-2026-74481 CVE-2026-74482 CVE-2026-74485 CVE-2026-74487 CVE-2026-74488 CVE-2026-74490 CVE-2026-74492 CVE-2026-74493 CVE-2026-74494 CVE-2026-74495 CVE-2026-74497 CVE-2026-74498 CVE-2026-74499 CVE-2026-74505 CVE-2026-74507 CVE-2026-74508 CVE-2026-74509 CVE-2026-74510 CVE-2026-74512 CVE-2026-74514 CVE-2026-74515 CVE-2026-74516 CVE-2026-74518 CVE-2026-74519 CVE-2026-74522 CVE-2026-74523 CVE-2026-74525 CVE-2026-74540 CVE-2026-74546 CVE-2026-74547 CVE-2026-74548 CVE-2026-74549 CVE-2026-74550 CVE-2026-74551 CVE-2026-74552 CVE-2026-74553 CVE-2026-74555 CVE-2026-74556 CVE-2026-74557 CVE-2026-74563 CVE-2026-74564 CVE-2026-74566 CVE-2026-74567 CVE-2026-74569 CVE-2026-74575 CVE-2026-74577 CVE-2026-74579 CVE-2026-74580 CVE-2026-74581 CVE-2026-74582 CVE-2026-74583 CVE-2026-74585 CVE-2026-74586 CVE-2026-74587 CVE-2026-74588 CVE-2026-74589 CVE-2026-74594 CVE-2026-74595 CVE-2026-74597 CVE-2026-74598 CVE-2026-74601 CVE-2026-74603 CVE-2026-74604 CVE-2026-74607 CVE-2026-74608 CVE-2026-74609 CVE-2026-74612 CVE-2026-74613 CVE-2026-74614 CVE-2026-74615 CVE-2026-74616 CVE-2026-74620 CVE-2026-74621 CVE-2026-74622 CVE-2026-74623 CVE-2026-74624 CVE-2026-74625 CVE-2026-74626 CVE-2026-74628 CVE-2026-74630 CVE-2026-74631 CVE-2026-74632 CVE-2026-74635 CVE-2026-74636 CVE-2026-74637 CVE-2026-74641 CVE-2026-74647 CVE-2026-74648 CVE-2026-74649 CVE-2026-74650 CVE-2026-74651 CVE-2026-74654 CVE-2026-74656 CVE-2026-74657 CVE-2026-74658 CVE-2026-74659 CVE-2026-74660 CVE-2026-74662 CVE-2026-74663 CVE-2026-74664 CVE-2026-74666 CVE-2026-74667 CVE-2026-74668 CVE-2026-74669 CVE-2026-74671 CVE-2026-74672 CVE-2026-74673 CVE-2026-74675 CVE-2026-74676 CVE-2026-74678 CVE-2026-74679 CVE-2026-74680 CVE-2026-74682 CVE-2026-74683 CVE-2026-74688 CVE-2026-74689 CVE-2026-74691 CVE-2026-74692 CVE-2026-74693 CVE-2026-74694 CVE-2026-74696 CVE-2026-74697 CVE-2026-74701 CVE-2026-74704 CVE-2026-74705 CVE-2026-74714 CVE-2026-74717 CVE-2026-74719 CVE-2026-74720 CVE-2026-74722 CVE-2026-74724 CVE-2026-74726 CVE-2026-74730 CVE-2026-74737 CVE-2026-74739 CVE-2026-74743 CVE-2026-74744 CVE-2026-74746 CVE-2026-74748 CVE-2026-80527 CVE-2026-80528 CVE-2026-80529 CVE-2026-80534 CVE-2026-80536 CVE-2026-80539 CVE-2026-80540 CVE-2026-80541 CVE-2026-80547 CVE-2026-80548 CVE-2026-80549 CVE-2026-80550 CVE-2026-80552 CVE-2026-80553 CVE-2026-80555 CVE-2026-80557 CVE-2026-80558 CVE-2026-80559 CVE-2026-80560 CVE-2026-80561 CVE-2026-80562 CVE-2026-80565 CVE-2026-80567 CVE-2026-80568 CVE-2026-80569 CVE-2026-80570 CVE-2026-80572 CVE-2026-80573 CVE-2026-80574 CVE-2026-80583 CVE-2026-80584 CVE-2026-80586 CVE-2026-80589 CVE-2026-80590 CVE-2026-80678 CVE-2026-80679 CVE-2026-80680 CVE-2026-80681 CVE-2026-80684 CVE-2026-80686 CVE-2026-80706 CVE-2026-80707 CVE-2026-80708 CVE-2026-80709 CVE-2026-80714 CVE-2026-80715 CVE-2026-80716 CVE-2026-80717 CVE-2026-80718 CVE-2026-80722 CVE-2026-80725 CVE-2026-80726 CVE-2026-80730 CVE-2026-80731 CVE-2026-80732 CVE-2026-80733 CVE-2026-80737 CVE-2026-80742 CVE-2026-80743 CVE-2026-80744 CVE-2026-80752 CVE-2026-80754 CVE-2026-80756 CVE-2026-80757 CVE-2026-80762 CVE-2026-80763 CVE-2026-80764 CVE-2026-80765 CVE-2026-80766 CVE-2026-80767 CVE-2026-80768 CVE-2026-80770 CVE-2026-80772 CVE-2026-80781 CVE-2026-80782 CVE-2026-80783 CVE-2026-80784 CVE-2026-80788 CVE-2026-80789 CVE-2026-80790 CVE-2026-80791 CVE-2026-80792 CVE-2026-80793 CVE-2026-80794 CVE-2026-80795 CVE-2026-80796 CVE-2026-80797 CVE-2026-80798 CVE-2026-80799 CVE-2026-80800 CVE-2026-80801 CVE-2026-80802 CVE-2026-80803 CVE-2026-80805 CVE-2026-80806 CVE-2026-80807 CVE-2026-80808 CVE-2026-80809 CVE-2026-80812 CVE-2026-80814 CVE-2026-80819 CVE-2026-80823 CVE-2026-80824 CVE-2026-80826 CVE-2026-80827 CVE-2026-80828 CVE-2026-80829 CVE-2026-80830 CVE-2026-80831 CVE-2026-80832 CVE-2026-80840 CVE-2026-80842 CVE-2026-80843 CVE-2026-80844 CVE-2026-80846 CVE-2026-80848 CVE-2026-80852 CVE-2026-80854 CVE-2026-80855 CVE-2026-80856 CVE-2026-80863 CVE-2026-80888 CVE-2026-80890 CVE-2026-80891 CVE-2026-80892 CVE-2026-80893 CVE-2026-80901 CVE-2026-80902 CVE-2026-80904 CVE-2026-80906 CVE-2026-80908 CVE-2026-80909 CVE-2026-80910 CVE-2026-80913

    在 Linux 核心中發現數個弱點，這些弱點可能會導致特權提升、拒絕服務或資訊洩漏。

    對於 Debian 12 書蟲來說，這些問題已經在版本 6.1.187-1中修復了。

    建議您升級 linux 套件。

    如需有關 linux 安全性狀態的詳細資訊，請參閱其安全追蹤頁面：
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/linux

    有關 Debian LTS 安全公告、如何將這些更新套用至您的系統以及常見問題的詳細資訊，請參閱 : https://wiki.debian.org/LTS

Tenable 已直接從 Debian 安全公告擷取前置描述區塊。

請注意，Nessus 並未測試這些問題，而是僅依據應用程式自我報告的版本號碼作出判斷。

ID	名稱	產品	系列	已發布	已更新	嚴重性
343012	Linux Distros 未修補弱點：CVE-2026-80829	Nessus	Misc.	2026/9/4	2026/11/6	high
364137	Oracle Linux 10 / 9：Unbreakable Enterprise 核心 (ELSA-2026-500374)	Nessus	Oracle Linux Local Security Checks	2026/10/8	2026/10/8	high
369489	CentOS Linux 7 [TuxCare] 安全性更新：bpftool / kernel / kernel-debug / kernel-debug-devel / kernel-devel / etc 多個弱點（CENTOS7：CLSA-2026：1792234299）	Nessus	CentOS Local Security Checks	2026/10/21	2026/10/21	high
367921	CentOS Linux 6 [TuxCare] 安全性更新：核心 / kernel-abi-whitelists / kernel-debug / kernel-debug-devel / etc 多個弱點（CENTOS6：CLSA-2026：1791949745）	Nessus	CentOS Local Security Checks	2026/10/20	2026/10/22	high
351155	Debian dsa-6528 ： ata-modules-6.12.111+deb13-armmp-di - 安全性更新	Nessus	Debian Local Security Checks	2026/9/29	2026/9/29	high
363954	Oracle Linux 8/9：Unbreakable Enterprise 核心 (ELSA-2026-500377)	Nessus	Oracle Linux Local Security Checks	2026/10/7	2026/10/7	high
362907	Debian dla-4817 ： ata-modules-6.12.107+deb12-armmp-di - 安全性更新	Nessus	Debian Local Security Checks	2026/10/4	2026/10/4	high
343851	Debian dla-4777 ： ata-modules-6.1.0-52-armmp-di - 安全性更新	Nessus	Debian Local Security Checks	2026/9/8	2026/9/8	high

偵測

搜尋 Plugin

high

high

high

high

high

high

high

high