遠端 Debian 11 主機已安裝的套件會受到 dla-4664 公告中提及的多個弱點影響。

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Debian LTS 公告 DLA-4664-1 debian-lts@lists.debian.org https://www.debian.org/lts/security/Ben Hutchings 2026 年 7 月 3 日 https://wiki.debian.org/LTS-------------------------------------------------------------------------

    套件：linux 版本：5.10.259-1 CVE ID：CVE-2021-47188 CVE-2021-47211 CVE-2022-48703 CVE-2022-49135 CVE-2022-49158 CVE-2022-49183 CVE-2022-49822 CVE-2022-50073 CVE-2022-50472 CVE-2022-50493 CVE-2022-50552 CVE-2023-53133 CVE-2023-53421 CVE-2023-53596 CVE-2023-54129 CVE-2024-43902 CVE-2025-10263 CVE-2025-21863 CVE-2025-22026 CVE-2025-22107 CVE-2025-38129 CVE-2025-38250 CVE-2025-38584 CVE-2025-38710 CVE-2025-39929 CVE-2025-40164 CVE-2025-68340 CVE-2026-23066 CVE-2026-23099 CVE-2026-23442 CVE-2026-23444 CVE-2026-31407 CVE-2026-31449 CVE-2026-31489 CVE-2026-31532 CVE-2026-31576 CVE-2026-31577 CVE-2026-31578 CVE-2026-31580 CVE-2026-31581 CVE-2026-31583 CVE-2026-31585 CVE-2026-31586 CVE-2026-31588 CVE-2026-31590 CVE-2026-31596 CVE-2026-31597 CVE-2026-31598 CVE-2026-31599 CVE-2026-31602 CVE-2026-31603 CVE-2026-31605 CVE-2026-31607 CVE-2026-31615 CVE-2026-31616 CVE-2026-31617 CVE-2026-31618 CVE-2026-31619 CVE-2026-31622 CVE-2026-31623 CVE-2026-31624 CVE-2026-31625 CVE-2026-31626 CVE-2026-31627 CVE-2026-31629 CVE-2026-31630 CVE-2026-31634 CVE-2026-31637 CVE-2026-31642 CVE-2026-31656 CVE-2026-31657 CVE-2026-31664 CVE-2026-31673 CVE-2026-31676 CVE-2026-31681 CVE-2026-31684 CVE-2026-31685 CVE-2026-31686 CVE-2026-31696 CVE-2026-31697 CVE-2026-31698 CVE-2026-31699 CVE-2026-31700 CVE-2026-31701 CVE-2026-31708 CVE-2026-31715 CVE-2026-43052 CVE-2026-43058 CVE-2026-43075 CVE-2026-43076 CVE-2026-43080 CVE-2026-43085 CVE-2026-43089 CVE-2026-43093 CVE-2026-43103 CVE-2026-43104 CVE-2026-43105 CVE-2026-43110 CVE-2026-43111 CVE-2026-43113 CVE-2026-43114 CVE-2026-43117 CVE-2026-43281 CVE-2026-43350 CVE-2026-43492 CVE-2026-43493 CVE-2026-43494 CVE-2026-43496 CVE-2026-43497 CVE-2026-43501 CVE-2026-43502 CVE-2026-45834 CVE-2026-45835 CVE-2026-45836 CVE-2026-45838 CVE-2026-45840 CVE-2026-45841 CVE-2026-45842 CVE-2026-45843 CVE-2026-45844 CVE-2026-45846 CVE-2026-45850 CVE-2026-45986 CVE-2026-45987 CVE-2026-45991 CVE-2026-45994 CVE-2026-46002 CVE-2026-46003 CVE-2026-46004 CVE-2026-46006 CVE-2026-46018 CVE-2026-46019 CVE-2026-46021 CVE-2026-46022 CVE-2026-46023 CVE-2026-46026 CVE-2026-46027 CVE-2026-46033 CVE-2026-46038 CVE-2026-46040 CVE-2026-46043 CVE-2026-46044 CVE-2026-46046 CVE-2026-46047 CVE-2026-46049 CVE-2026-46051 CVE-2026-46052 CVE-2026-46053 CVE-2026-46056 CVE-2026-46064 CVE-2026-46069 CVE-2026-46070 CVE-2026-46077 CVE-2026-46078 CVE-2026-46080 CVE-2026-46086 CVE-2026-46088 CVE-2026-46090 CVE-2026-46091 CVE-2026-46098 CVE-2026-46101 CVE-2026-46102 CVE-2026-46103 CVE-2026-46107 CVE-2026-46108 CVE-2026-46109 CVE-2026-46120 CVE-2026-46122 CVE-2026-46124 CVE-2026-46127 CVE-2026-46128 CVE-2026-46132 CVE-2026-46133 CVE-2026-46137 CVE-2026-46146 CVE-2026-46149 CVE-2026-46150 CVE-2026-46151 CVE-2026-46159 CVE-2026-46160 CVE-2026-46161 CVE-2026-46163 CVE-2026-46167 CVE-2026-46169 CVE-2026-46172 CVE-2026-46177 CVE-2026-46178 CVE-2026-46180 CVE-2026-46184 CVE-2026-46187 CVE-2026-46189 CVE-2026-46191 CVE-2026-46196 CVE-2026-46198 CVE-2026-46205 CVE-2026-46206 CVE-2026-46208 CVE-2026-46209 CVE-2026-46212 CVE-2026-46214 CVE-2026-46220 CVE-2026-46227 CVE-2026-46231 CVE-2026-46233 CVE-2026-46234 CVE-2026-46236 CVE-2026-46238 CVE-2026-46275 CVE-2026-46276 CVE-2026-46285 CVE-2026-46291 CVE-2026-46292 CVE-2026-46294 CVE-2026-46299 CVE-2026-46301 CVE-2026-46303 CVE-2026-46304 CVE-2026-46307 CVE-2026-46319 CVE-2026-46320 CVE-2026-46321 CVE-2026-46322 CVE-2026-52909 CVE-2026-52910 CVE-2026-52912 CVE-2026-52913 CVE-2026-52914 CVE-2026-52915 CVE-2026-52916 CVE-2026-52917 CVE-2026-52918 CVE-2026-52919 CVE-2026-52920 CVE-2026-52921 CVE-2026-52922 CVE-2026-52923 CVE-2026-52924 CVE-2026-52925 CVE-2026-52926 CVE-2026-52927 CVE-2026-52929 CVE-2026-52930 CVE-2026-52931 CVE-2026-52934 CVE-2026-52935 CVE-2026-52939 CVE-2026-52943 CVE-2026-52946 CVE-2026-52947 CVE-2026-52948 CVE-2026-52954 CVE-2026-52955 CVE-2026-52957 CVE-2026-52958 CVE-2026-52962 CVE-2026-52963 CVE-2026-52970 CVE-2026-52972 CVE-2026-52982 CVE-2026-52984 CVE-2026-52985 CVE-2026-52986 CVE-2026-52992 CVE-2026-52993 CVE-2026-52995 CVE-2026-52998 CVE-2026-52999 CVE-2026-53001 CVE-2026-53002 CVE-2026-53003 CVE-2026-53004 CVE-2026-53006 CVE-2026-53011 CVE-2026-53012 CVE-2026-53016 CVE-2026-53021 CVE-2026-53037 CVE-2026-53039 CVE-2026-53040 CVE-2026-53041 CVE-2026-53043 CVE-2026-53045 CVE-2026-53047 CVE-2026-53050 CVE-2026-53059 CVE-2026-53060 CVE-2026-53061 CVE-2026-53062 CVE-2026-53064 CVE-2026-53065 CVE-2026-53068 CVE-2026-53071 CVE-2026-53072 CVE-2026-53073 CVE-2026-53074 CVE-2026-53075 CVE-2026-53077 CVE-2026-53080 CVE-2026-53082 CVE-2026-53088 CVE-2026-53093 CVE-2026-53112 CVE-2026-53128 CVE-2026-53130 CVE-2026-53133 CVE-2026-53134 CVE-2026-53135 CVE-2026-53137 CVE-2026-53146 CVE-2026-53148 CVE-2026-53149 CVE-2026-53150 CVE-2026-53161 CVE-2026-53168 CVE-2026-53176 CVE-2026-53181 CVE-2026-53186 CVE-2026-53189 CVE-2026-53194 CVE-2026-53195 CVE-2026-53196 CVE-2026-53199 CVE-2026-53208 CVE-2026-53212 CVE-2026-53217 CVE-2026-53218 CVE-2026-53219 CVE-2026-53221 CVE-2026-53223 CVE-2026-53225 CVE-2026-53227 CVE-2026-53228 CVE-2026-53238 CVE-2026-53239 CVE-2026-53242 CVE-2026-53245 CVE-2026-53249 CVE-2026-53255 CVE-2026-53256 CVE-2026-53263 CVE-2026-53264 CVE-2026-53266 CVE-2026-53268 CVE-2026-53269 CVE-2026-53270 CVE-2026-53273 CVE-2026-53287 CVE-2026-53294 CVE-2026-53295 CVE-2026-53296 CVE-2026-53304 CVE-2026-53309 CVE-2026-53320 CVE-2026-53337 CVE-2026-53339 CVE-2026-53352 CVE-2026-53354 CVE-2026-53355 CVE-2026-53356 CVE-2026-53357 Debian 錯誤：1130365 1119093

    在 Linux 核心中發現數個弱點，這些弱點可能會導致特權提升、拒絕服務或資訊洩漏。

    針對 Debian 11 Bullseye，已在 5.10.259-1 版本中修正這些問題。此版本還包括來自穩定更新 5.10.258 和 5.10.259的更多錯誤修復。

    建議您升級 linux 套件。

    如需有關 linux 安全性狀態的詳細資訊，請參閱其安全追蹤頁面：
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/linux

    有關 Debian LTS 安全公告、如何將這些更新套用至您的系統以及常見問題的詳細資訊，請參閱：https://wiki.debian.org/LTSAttachment:signature.ascDescription: PGP signature

Tenable 已直接從 Debian 安全公告擷取前置描述區塊。

請注意，Nessus 並未測試這些問題，而是僅依據應用程式自我報告的版本號碼作出判斷。

Linux/Unix 主機上安裝了一個或多個受到弱點影響的套件，且供應商未提供可用的修補程式。

  - octeontx2-af新增 lmac 類型的驗證實體連結變更時韌體會向核心報告變更情況以及速度、lmac_type_id 等詳細資料。核心根據從韌體接收的 lmac_type_id 衍生 lmac_type。在少數情況下韌體會傳回無效的 lmac_type_id其會導致下列核心錯誤。此修補程式新增了 lmac_type_id 欄位遺漏的驗證。
    內部錯誤Oops96000005 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 35.321595] 連結於的模組[ 35.328982] CPU0 PID
    31 Commkworker/0:1 未受污染的 5.4.210-g2e3169d8e1bc-dirty #17 [ 35.337014] 硬體名稱Marvell CN103XX board (DT) [ 35.344297] 工作佇列事件 work_for_cpu_fn [ 35.352730] pstate 40400089 (nZcv daIf + PAN -UAO) [ 35.360267] pc strncpy+0x10/0x30 [ 35.366595] lr cgx_link_change_handler+0x90/0x180 (CVE-2023-54129)

請注意，Nessus 的判定取決於廠商所報告的套件是否存在。

AlmaLinux 9.2 主機已安裝的套件會受到 TuxCare ALMALINUX9.2：CLSA-2026：1786761805 公告中提及的多個弱點影響。

  - 在 KVM 的 AMD 巢狀虛擬化 (SVM) 中發現一個缺陷。惡意的 L1 來賓可有意放棄攔截合作巢狀來賓 (L2) 的關機動作，這可能導致主機 (L0) 中發生索引標籤錯誤和核心錯誤。(CVE-2022-3344)

  - 已解決 Linux 核心中的下列弱點：usbnet: Run unregister_netdev() before unbind() again Commit 2c9d6c2b871d (usbnet: run unbind() before unregister_netdev()) sought to fix a use-after-free on disconnect of USB Ethernet adapters. It turns out that a different fix is necessary to address the issue:
    https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/18b3541e5372bc9b9fc733d422f4e698c089077c.1650177997.git.lukas@wunner.de/ So the commit was not necessary. The commit made binding and unbinding of USB Ethernet asymmetrical: Before, usbnet_probe() first invoked the ->bind() callback and then register_netdev(). usbnet_disconnect() mirrored that by first invoking unregister_netdev() and then ->unbind(). Since the commit, the order in usbnet_disconnect() is reversed and no longer mirrors usbnet_probe(). One consequence is that a PHY disconnected (and stopped) in ->unbind() is afterwards stopped once more by unregister_netdev() as it closes the netdev before unregistering. That necessitates a contortion in ->stop() because the PHY may only be stopped if it hasn't already been disconnected. Reverting the commit allows making the call to phy_stop() unconditional in ->stop(). (CVE-2022-49501)

  - 已解決 Linux 核心中的下列弱點：crypto: arm64/poly1305 - fix a read out-of-bound A kasan error was reported during fuzzing: BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in neon_poly1305_blocks.constprop.0+0x1b4/0x250 [poly1305_neon] Read of size 4 at addr ffff0010e293f010 by task syz-executor.5/1646715 CPU: 4 PID: 1646715 Comm: syz-executor.5 Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.10.0.aarch64 #1 Hardware name: Huawei TaiShan 2280 /BC11SPCD, BIOS 1.59 01/31/2019 Call trace:
    dump_backtrace+0x0/0x394 show_stack+0x34/0x4c arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:196 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0x158/0x1e4 lib/dump_stack.c:118 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x68/0x204 mm/kasan/report.c:387 __kasan_report+0xe0/0x140 mm/kasan/report.c:547 kasan_report+0x44/0xe0 mm/kasan/report.c:564 check_memory_region_inline mm/kasan/generic.c:187 [inline] __asan_load4+0x94/0xd0 mm/kasan/generic.c:252 neon_poly1305_blocks.constprop.0+0x1b4/0x250 [poly1305_neon] neon_poly1305_do_update+0x6c/0x15c [poly1305_neon] neon_poly1305_update+0x9c/0x1c4 [poly1305_neon] crypto_shash_update crypto/shash.c:131 [inline] shash_finup_unaligned+0x84/0x15c crypto/shash.c:179 crypto_shash_finup+0x8c/0x140 crypto/shash.c:193 shash_digest_unaligned+0xb8/0xe4 crypto/shash.c:201 crypto_shash_digest+0xa4/0xfc crypto/shash.c:217 crypto_shash_tfm_digest+0xb4/0x150 crypto/shash.c:229 essiv_skcipher_setkey+0x164/0x200 [essiv] crypto_skcipher_setkey+0xb0/0x160 crypto/skcipher.c:612 skcipher_setkey+0x3c/0x50 crypto/algif_skcipher.c:305 alg_setkey+0x114/0x2a0 crypto/af_alg.c:220 alg_setsockopt+0x19c/0x210 crypto/af_alg.c:253 __sys_setsockopt+0x190/0x2e0 net/socket.c:2123 __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2134 [inline] __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2131 [inline] __arm64_sys_setsockopt+0x78/0x94 net/socket.c:2131
    __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:36 [inline] invoke_syscall+0x64/0x100 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:48 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x220/0x230 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:155 do_el0_svc+0xb4/0xd4 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:217 el0_svc+0x24/0x3c arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:353 el0_sync_handler+0x160/0x164 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:369 el0_sync+0x160/0x180 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:683 This error can be reproduced by the following code compiled as ko on a system with kasan enabled: #include <linux/module.h> #include <linux/crypto.h> #include <crypto/hash.h> #include <crypto/poly1305.h> char test_data[] = \x00\x01\x02\x03\x04\x05\x06\x07 \x08\x09\x0a\x0b\x0c\x0d\x0e\x0f \x10\x11\x12\x13\x14\x15\x16\x17 \x18\x19\x1a\x1b\x1c\x1d\x1e; int init(void) { struct crypto_shash *tfm = NULL; char *data = NULL, *out = NULL; tfm = crypto_alloc_shash(poly1305, 0, 0); data = kmalloc(POLY1305_KEY_SIZE - 1, GFP_KERNEL); out = kmalloc(POLY1305_DIGEST_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL); memcpy(data, test_data, POLY1305_KEY_SIZE - 1);
    crypto_shash_tfm_digest(tfm, data, POLY1305_KEY_SIZE - 1, out); kfree(data); kfree(out); return 0; } void deinit(void) { } module_init(init) module_exit(deinit) MODULE_LICENSE(GPL); The root cause of the bug sits in neon_poly1305_blocks. The logic neon_poly1305_blocks() performed is that if it was called with both s[] and r[] uninitialized, it will first try to initialize them with the data from the first block that it believed to be 32 bytes in length. First 16 bytes are used as the key and the next 16 bytes for s[]. This would lead to the aforementioned read out-of-bound. However, after calling poly1305_init_arch(), only 16 bytes were deducted from the input and s[] is initialized yet again with the following 16 bytes.
    The second initialization of s[] is certainly redundent which indicates that the first initialization should be for r[] only. This patch fixes the issue by calling poly1305_init_arm64() instead o
    ---truncated--- (CVE-2022-50231)

  - 已解決 Linux 核心中的下列弱點：bpf: Fix reference state management for synchronous callbacks Currently, verifier verifies callback functions (sync and async) as if they will be executed once, (i.e. it explores execution state as if the function was being called once). The next insn to explore is set to start of subprog and the exit from nested frame is handled using curframe > 0 and prepare_func_exit. In case of async callback it uses a customized variant of push_stack simulating a kind of branch to set up custom state and execution context for the async callback. While this approach is simple and works when callback really will be executed only once, it is unsafe for all of our current helpers which are for_each style, i.e. they execute the callback multiple times. A callback releasing acquired references of the caller may do so multiple times, but currently verifier sees it as one call inside the frame, which then returns to caller. Hence, it thinks it released some reference that the cb e.g. got access through callback_ctx (register filled inside cb from spilled typed register on stack).
    Similarly, it may see that an acquire call is unpaired inside the callback, so the caller will copy the reference state of callback and then will have to release the register with new ref_obj_ids. But again, the callback may execute multiple times, but the verifier will only account for acquired references for a single symbolic execution of the callback, which will cause leaks. Note that for async callback case, things are different. While currently we have bpf_timer_set_callback which only executes it once, even for multiple executions it would be safe, as reference state is NULL and check_reference_leak would force program to release state before BPF_EXIT. The state is also unaffected by analysis for the caller frame.
    Hence async callback is safe. Since we want the reference state to be accessible, e.g. for pointers loaded from stack through callback_ctx's PTR_TO_STACK, we still have to copy caller's reference_state to callback's bpf_func_state, but we enforce that whatever references it adds to that reference_state has been released before it hits BPF_EXIT. This requires introducing a new callback_ref member in the reference state to distinguish between caller vs callee references. Hence, check_reference_leak now errors out if it sees we are in callback_fn and we have not released callback_ref refs. Since there can be multiple nested callbacks, like frame 0 -> cb1 -> cb2 etc. we need to also distinguish between whether this particular ref belongs to this callback frame or parent, and only error for our own, so we store state->frameno (which is always non-zero for callbacks). In short, callbacks can read parent reference_state, but cannot mutate it, to be able to use pointers acquired by the caller. They must only undo their changes (by releasing their own acquired_refs before BPF_EXIT) on top of caller reference_state before returning (at which point the caller and callback state will match anyway, so no need to copy it back to caller). (CVE-2022-50650)

  - 已解決 Linux 核心中的下列弱點：net: stmmac: fix possible memory leak in stmmac_dvr_probe() The bitmap_free() should be called to free priv->af_xdp_zc_qps when create_singlethread_workqueue() fails, otherwise there will be a memory leak, so we add the err path error_wq_init to fix it. (CVE-2022-50663)

請注意，Nessus 並未測試這些問題，而是僅依據應用程式自我報告的版本號碼作出判斷。

ID	名稱	產品	系列	已發布	已更新	嚴重性
325018	Debian dla-4664 ： ata-modules-5.10.0-43-armmp-di - 安全性更新	Nessus	Debian Local Security Checks	2026/7/3	2026/9/18	high
279849	Linux Distros 未修補的弱點：CVE-2023-54129	Nessus	Misc.	2025/12/24	2026/11/5	high
352031	AlmaLinux 9.2 [TuxCare] 安全性更新：bpftool / kernel / kernel-64k / kernel-64k-core / kernel-64k-debug / etc 多個弱點（ALMALINUX9.2：CLSA-2026：1786761805）	Nessus	Alma Linux Local Security Checks	2026/9/30	2026/10/19	critical

偵測

搜尋 Plugin

high

high

critical