According to the versions of the python2 packages installed, the EulerOS Virtualization installation on the remote host is affected by the following vulnerabilities :

  - A use-after-free exists in Python through 3.9 via heappushpop in heapq. (CVE-2022-48560)

  - An XML External Entity (XXE) issue was discovered in Python through 3.9.1. The plistlib module no longer     accepts entity declarations in XML plist files to avoid XML vulnerabilities. (CVE-2022-48565)

  - An issue was discovered in compare_digest in Lib/hmac.py in Python through 3.9.1. Constant-time-defeating     optimisations were possible in the accumulator variable in hmac.compare_digest. (CVE-2022-48566)

Note that Tenable Network Security has extracted the preceding description block directly from the EulerOS security advisory. Tenable has attempted to automatically clean and format it as much as possible without introducing additional issues.

An update of the python3 package has been released.

The remote Ubuntu 16.04 ESM host has packages installed that are affected by a vulnerability as referenced in the USN-6394-1 advisory.

  - A use-after-free exists in Python through 3.9 via heappushpop in heapq. (CVE-2022-48560)

Note that Nessus has not tested for this issue but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version number.

The remote Fedora 38 host has a package installed that is affected by a vulnerability as referenced in the FEDORA-2023-34a3a5adba advisory.

  - A use-after-free exists in Python through 3.9 via heappushpop in heapq. (CVE-2022-48560)

Note that Nessus has not tested for this issue but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version number.

The remote Fedora 39 host has a package installed that is affected by a vulnerability as referenced in the FEDORA-2023-9954dae554 advisory.

  - A use-after-free exists in Python through 3.9 via heappushpop in heapq. (CVE-2022-48560)

Note that Nessus has not tested for this issue but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version number.

The remote Debian 10 host has packages installed that are affected by multiple vulnerabilities as referenced in the dla-3575 advisory.

  - The package python/cpython from 0 and before 3.6.13, from 3.7.0 and before 3.7.10, from 3.8.0 and before     3.8.8, from 3.9.0 and before 3.9.2 are vulnerable to Web Cache Poisoning via urllib.parse.parse_qsl and     urllib.parse.parse_qs by using a vector called parameter cloaking. When the attacker can separate query     parameters using a semicolon (;), they can cause a difference in the interpretation of the request between     the proxy (running with default configuration) and the server. This can result in malicious requests being     cached as completely safe ones, as the proxy would usually not see the semicolon as a separator, and     therefore would not include it in a cache key of an unkeyed parameter. (CVE-2021-23336)

  - A flaw was found in Python, specifically within the urllib.parse module. This module helps break Uniform     Resource Locator (URL) strings into components. The issue involves how the urlparse method does not     sanitize input and allows characters like '\r' and '\n' in the URL path. This flaw allows an attacker to     input a crafted URL, leading to injection attacks. This flaw affects Python versions prior to 3.10.0b1,     3.9.5, 3.8.11, 3.7.11 and 3.6.14. (CVE-2022-0391)

  - A use-after-free exists in Python through 3.9 via heappushpop in heapq. (CVE-2022-48560)

  - An XML External Entity (XXE) issue was discovered in Python through 3.9.1. The plistlib module no longer     accepts entity declarations in XML plist files to avoid XML vulnerabilities. (CVE-2022-48565)

  - An issue was discovered in compare_digest in Lib/hmac.py in Python through 3.9.1. Constant-time-defeating     optimisations were possible in the accumulator variable in hmac.compare_digest. (CVE-2022-48566)

  - An issue in the urllib.parse component of Python before 3.11.4 allows attackers to bypass blocklisting     methods by supplying a URL that starts with blank characters. (CVE-2023-24329)

  - An issue was discovered in Python before 3.8.18, 3.9.x before 3.9.18, 3.10.x before 3.10.13, and 3.11.x     before 3.11.5. It primarily affects servers (such as HTTP servers) that use TLS client authentication. If     a TLS server-side socket is created, receives data into the socket buffer, and then is closed quickly,     there is a brief window where the SSLSocket instance will detect the socket as not connected and won't     initiate a handshake, but buffered data will still be readable from the socket buffer. This data will not     be authenticated if the server-side TLS peer is expecting client certificate authentication, and is     indistinguishable from valid TLS stream data. Data is limited in size to the amount that will fit in the     buffer. (The TLS connection cannot directly be used for data exfiltration because the vulnerable code path     requires that the connection be closed on initialization of the SSLSocket.) (CVE-2023-40217)

Note that Nessus has not tested for these issues but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version number.

The remote Ubuntu 14.04 LTS / 16.04 LTS / 18.04 LTS / 20.04 LTS / 22.04 LTS / 23.10 host has packages installed that are affected by multiple vulnerabilities as referenced in the USN-6891-1 advisory.

    It was discovered that Python incorrectly handled certain inputs. An attacker could possibly use this     issue to execute arbitrary code. This issue only affected Ubuntu 14.04 LTS and Ubuntu 18.04 LTS.
    (CVE-2015-20107)

    It was discovered that Python incorrectly used regular expressions vulnerable to catastrophic     backtracking. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause a denial of service. This issue     only affected Ubuntu 14.04 LTS. (CVE-2018-1060, CVE-2018-1061)

    It was discovered that Python failed to initialize Expats hash salt. A remote attacker could possibly     use this issue to cause hash collisions, leading to a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu     14.04 LTS. (CVE-2018-14647)

    It was discovered that Python incorrectly handled certain pickle files. An attacker could possibly use     this issue to consume memory, leading to a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 14.04 LTS.
    (CVE-2018-20406)

    It was discovered that Python incorrectly validated the domain when handling cookies. An attacker could     possibly trick Python into sending cookies to the wrong domain. This issue only affected Ubuntu 14.04 LTS.
    (CVE-2018-20852)

    Jonathan Birch and Panayiotis Panayiotou discovered that Python incorrectly handled Unicode encoding     during NFKC normalization. An attacker could possibly use this issue to obtain sensitive information. This     issue only affected Ubuntu 14.04 LTS. (CVE-2019-9636, CVE-2019-10160)

    It was discovered that Python incorrectly parsed certain email addresses. A remote attacker could possibly     use this issue to trick Python applications into accepting email addresses that should be denied. This     issue only affected Ubuntu 14.04 LTS. (CVE-2019-16056)

    It was discovered that the Python documentation XML-RPC server incorrectly handled certain fields. A     remote attacker could use this issue to execute a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack. This issue only     affected Ubuntu 14.04 LTS. (CVE-2019-16935)

    It was discovered that Python documentation had a misleading information. A security issue could be     possibly caused by wrong assumptions of this information. This issue only affected Ubuntu 14.04 LTS and     Ubuntu 18.04 LTS. (CVE-2019-17514)

    It was discovered that Python incorrectly stripped certain characters from requests. A remote attacker     could use this issue to perform CRLF injection. This issue only affected Ubuntu 14.04 LTS and Ubuntu 18.04     LTS. (CVE-2019-18348)

    It was discovered that Python incorrectly handled certain TAR archives. An attacker could possibly use     this issue to cause a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 14.04 LTS and Ubuntu 18.04 LTS.
    (CVE-2019-20907)

    Colin Read and Nicolas Edet discovered that Python incorrectly handled parsing certain X509 certificates.
    An attacker could possibly use this issue to cause Python to crash, resulting in a denial of service. This     issue only affected Ubuntu 14.04 LTS. (CVE-2019-5010)

    It was discovered that incorrectly handled certain ZIP files. An attacker could possibly use this issue to     cause a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 14.04 LTS. (CVE-2019-9674)

    It was discovered that Python incorrectly handled certain urls. A remote attacker could possibly use this     issue to perform CRLF injection attacks. This issue only affected Ubuntu 14.04 LTS. (CVE-2019-9740,     CVE-2019-9947)

    Sihoon Lee discovered that Python incorrectly handled the local_file: scheme. A remote attacker could     possibly use this issue to bypass blocklist meschanisms. This issue only affected Ubuntu 14.04 LTS.
    (CVE-2019-9948)

    It was discovered that Python incorrectly handled certain IP values. An attacker could possibly use this     issue to cause a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 14.04 LTS and Ubuntu 18.04 LTS.
    (CVE-2020-14422)

    It was discovered that Python incorrectly handled certain character sequences. A remote attacker could     possibly use this issue to perform CRLF injection. This issue only affected Ubuntu 14.04 LTS and Ubuntu     18.04 LTS. (CVE-2020-26116)

    It was discovered that Python incorrectly handled certain inputs. An attacker could possibly use this     issue to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 14.04 LTS.
    (CVE-2020-27619, CVE-2021-3177)

    It was discovered that Python incorrectly handled certain HTTP requests. An attacker could possibly use     this issue to cause a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 14.04 LTS. (CVE-2020-8492)

    It was discovered that the Python stdlib ipaddress API incorrectly handled octal strings. A remote     attacker could possibly use this issue to perform a wide variety of attacks, including bypassing certain     access restrictions. This issue only affected Ubuntu 18.04 LTS. (CVE-2021-29921)

    David Schwrer discovered that Python incorrectly handled certain inputs. An attacker could possibly use     this issue to expose sensitive information. This issue only affected Ubuntu 18.04 LTS. (CVE-2021-3426)

    It was discovered that Python incorrectly handled certain RFCs. An attacker could possibly use this issue     to cause a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 14.04 LTS. (CVE-2021-3733)

    It was discovered that Python incorrectly handled certain server responses. An attacker could possibly use     this issue to cause a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 14.04 LTS. (CVE-2021-3737)

    It was discovered that Python incorrectly handled certain FTP requests. An attacker could possibly use     this issue to expose sensitive information. This issue only affected Ubuntu 14.04 LTS and Ubuntu 18.04     LTS. (CVE-2021-4189)

    It was discovered that Python incorrectly handled certain inputs. An attacker could possibly use this     issue to execute arbitrary code. This issue only affected Ubuntu 14.04 LTS and Ubuntu 18.04 LTS.
    (CVE-2022-0391)

    Devin Jeanpierre discovered that Python incorrectly handled sockets when the multiprocessing module was     being used. A local attacker could possibly use this issue to execute arbitrary code and escalate     privileges. This issue only affected Ubuntu 22.04 LTS. (CVE-2022-42919)

    It was discovered that Python incorrectly handled certain inputs. If a user or an automated system were     tricked into running a specially crafted input, a remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause a     denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 14.04 LTS, Ubuntu 18.04 LTS and Ubuntu 22.04 LTS.
    (CVE-2022-45061, CVE-2023-24329)

    It was discovered that Python incorrectly handled certain scripts. An attacker could possibly use this     issue to execute arbitrary code or cause a crash. This issue only affected Ubuntu 14.04 LTS and Ubuntu     18.04 LTS. (CVE-2022-48560)

    It was discovered that Python incorrectly handled certain plist files. If a user or an automated system     were tricked into processing a specially crafted plist file, an attacker could possibly use this issue to     consume resources, resulting in a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 14.04 LTS and Ubuntu     18.04 LTS. (CVE-2022-48564)

    It was discovered that Python did not properly handle XML entity declarations in plist files. An attacker     could possibly use this vulnerability to perform an XML External Entity (XXE) injection, resulting in a     denial of service or information disclosure. This issue only affected Ubuntu 14.04 LTS and Ubuntu 18.04     LTS. (CVE-2022-48565)

    It was discovered that Python did not properly provide constant-time processing for a crypto operation. An     attacker could possibly use this issue to perform a timing attack and recover sensitive information. This     issue only affected Ubuntu 14.04 LTS and Ubuntu 18.04 LTS. (CVE-2022-48566)

    It was discovered that Python instances of ssl.SSLSocket were vulnerable to a bypass of the TLS handshake.
    An attacker could possibly use this issue to cause applications to treat unauthenticated received data     before TLS handshake as authenticated data after TLS handshake. This issue only affected Ubuntu 14.04 LTS,     Ubuntu 18.04 LTS, Ubuntu 20.04 LTS and Ubuntu 22.04 LTS. (CVE-2023-40217)

    It was discovered that Python incorrectly handled null bytes when normalizing pathnames. An attacker could     possibly use this issue to bypass certain filename checks. This issue only affected Ubuntu 22.04 LTS.
    (CVE-2023-41105)

    It was discovered that Python incorrectly handled privilege with certain parameters. An attacker could     possibly use this issue to maintain the original processes' groups before starting the new process. This     issue only affected Ubuntu 23.10. (CVE-2023-6507)

    It was discovered that Python incorrectly handled symlinks in temp files. An attacker could possibly use     this issue to modify the permissions of files. This issue only affected Ubuntu 18.04 LTS, Ubuntu 20.04     LTS, Ubuntu 22.04 LTS and Ubuntu 23.10. (CVE-2023-6597)

    It was discovered that Python incorrectly handled certain crafted zip files. An attacker could possibly     use this issue to crash the program, resulting in a denial of service. (CVE-2024-0450)

Tenable has extracted the preceding description block directly from the Ubuntu security advisory.

Note that Nessus has not tested for these issues but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version number.

遠端 Redhat Enterprise Linux 8 主機上安裝的套件受到 RHSA-2024: 0586 公告。

  - 在 Python 3.9 及更低版本中，透過 heapq 中的 heappushpop 存在釋放後使用弱點。(CVE-2022-48560)

  - 在 Python 3.9.1 及更低版本中，plistlib.py 的 read_ints 在處理二進位格式的格式錯誤 Apple Property List 檔案時，容易因 CPU 和 RAM 耗盡而受到潛在的 DoS 攻擊。(CVE-2022-48564)

  - Python 3.11.3 及其之前所有版本的電子郵件模組未正確剖析含有特殊字元的電子郵件地址。RFC2822 標頭的錯誤部分被識別為 addr-spec 的值。在某些應用程式中，攻擊者可略過保護機制，而在此保護機制中，只有在驗證特定網域的電子郵件收到之後，系統才會授予應用程式存取權 (例如，只有 @company.example.com 地址可用於註冊)。此問題發生在 Python 最新版本的 email/_parseaddr.py 中。(CVE-2023-27043)

請注意，Nessus 並未測試這些問題，而是僅依據應用程式自我報告的版本號碼作出判斷。

遠端 Debian 10 主機上安裝的多個套件受到 dla-3614 公告中提及的多個弱點影響。

  - 在 Python 3.9 及更低版本中，透過 heapq 中的 heappushpop 存在釋放後使用弱點。(CVE-2022-48560)

  - 在 Python 3.9.1 及更低版本中，plistlib.py 的 read_ints 在處理二進位格式的格式錯誤 Apple Property List 檔案時，容易因 CPU 和 RAM 耗盡而受到潛在的 DoS 攻擊。(CVE-2022-48564)

  - 在 Python 3.9.1 及更低版本中發現 XML 外部實體 (XXE) 問題。plistlib 模組不再接受 XML plist 檔案中的實體宣告，以避免 XML 弱點。(CVE-2022-48565)

  - 在 Python 3.9.1 及更低版本的 Lib/hmac.py 之 compare_digest 中發現一個問題。在 hmac.compare_digest 的 accumulator 變數中可能進行常數時間失敗最佳化。(CVE-2022-48566)

  - 在 Python 3.8.18 之前的版本，3.9.18 之前的 3.9.x 版、3.10.13 之前的 3.10.x 版、3.11.5 之前的 3.11.x 版中發現一個問題。該弱點主要影響使用 TLS 用戶端驗證的伺服器 (例如 HTTP 伺服器)。如果建立了 TLS 伺服器端通訊端，將資料接收到通訊端緩衝區，然後快速關閉，則有一個短暫的視窗，SSLSocket 執行個體會將通訊端偵測為「未連線」，且不會發起交握，但攻擊者仍可從通訊端緩衝區讀取緩衝的資料。如果伺服器端 TLS 對等端預期收到用戶端憑證驗證，則此資料將不會經過驗證，且無法與有效的 TLS 資料流資料區別開來。資料大小限制為緩衝區可容納的數量。(TLS 連線無法直接用於資料洩漏，因為有弱點的程式碼路徑要求在 SSLSocket 初始化時關閉連線。) (CVE-2023-40217)

請注意，Nessus 並未測試這些問題，而是僅依據應用程式自我報告的版本號碼作出判斷。

遠端 Ubuntu 16.04 ESM 主機上安裝的多個套件受到 USN-6394-1 公告中提及的一個弱點影響。

  - 在 Python 3.9 及更低版本中，透過 heapq 中的 heappushpop 存在釋放後使用弱點。(CVE-2022-48560)

請注意，Nessus 並未測試此問題，而是僅依據應用程式自我報告的版本號碼作出判斷。

遠端 Debian 10 主機上安裝的多個套件受到 dla-3575 公告中提及的多個弱點影響。

  - python/cpython 套件 0 至 3.6.13 之前版本、3.7.0 至 3.7.10 之前版本、3.8.0 至 3.8.8 之前版本、3.9.0 至 3.9.2 之前版本容易受到 Web 快取毒害攻擊，攻擊者可使用一個稱為參數偽裝的向量透過 urllib.parse.parse_qsl 和 urllib.parse.parse_qs 發動攻擊。當攻擊者可使用分號 (;) 分隔查詢參數時，可造成 Proxy (以預設組態執行) 和伺服器之間的要求解譯不同。這可導致將惡意要求快取為完全安全的要求，因為 Proxy 通常不會將分號視為分隔符號，因此不會將其包含在無索引鍵參數的快取金鑰中。(CVE-2021-23336)

  - 在 Python 中發現一個缺陷，尤其是在 urllib.parse 模組中。此模組有助於將統一資源定位器 (URL) 字串分解為多個元件。此問題涉及如何讓 urlparse 方法不審查輸入，以及如何在 URL 路徑中允許「\r」和「\n」等字元。此缺陷允許攻擊者輸入建構的 URL，進而導致插入攻擊。此缺陷會影響 Python 3.10.0b1、3.9.5、3.8.11、3.7.11 和 3.6.14 之前的版本。(CVE-2022-0391)

  - 在 Python 3.9 及更低版本中，透過 heapq 中的 heappushpop 存在釋放後使用弱點。(CVE-2022-48560)

  - 在 Python 3.9.1 及更低版本中發現 XML 外部實體 (XXE) 問題。plistlib 模組不再接受 XML plist 檔案中的實體宣告，以避免 XML 弱點。(CVE-2022-48565)

  - 在 Python 3.9.1 及更低版本的 Lib/hmac.py 之 compare_digest 中發現一個問題。在 hmac.compare_digest 的 accumulator 變數中可能進行常數時間失敗最佳化。(CVE-2022-48566)

  - 在 Python 3.11.4 之前的版本中，urllib.parse 元件中有一個問題，攻擊者可藉此提供以空白字元開頭的 URL，從而繞過封鎖清單方法。(CVE-2023-24329)

  - 在 Python 3.8.18 之前的版本，3.9.18 之前的 3.9.x 版、3.10.13 之前的 3.10.x 版、3.11.5 之前的 3.11.x 版中發現一個問題。該弱點主要影響使用 TLS 用戶端驗證的伺服器 (例如 HTTP 伺服器)。如果建立了 TLS 伺服器端通訊端，將資料接收到通訊端緩衝區，然後快速關閉，則有一個短暫的視窗，SSLSocket 執行個體會將通訊端偵測為「未連線」，且不會發起交握，但攻擊者仍可從通訊端緩衝區讀取緩衝的資料。如果伺服器端 TLS 對等端預期收到用戶端憑證驗證，則此資料將不會經過驗證，且無法與有效的 TLS 資料流資料區別開來。資料大小限制為緩衝區可容納的數量。(TLS 連線無法直接用於資料洩漏，因為有弱點的程式碼路徑要求在 SSLSocket 初始化時關閉連線。) (CVE-2023-40217)

請注意，Nessus 並未測試這些問題，而是僅依據應用程式自我報告的版本號碼作出判斷。

遠端 Ubuntu 14.04 LTS / 16.04 LTS / 18.04 LTS / 20.04 LTS / 22.04 LTS / 23.10 主機上安裝的多個套件受到 USN-6891-1 公告中提及的多個弱點影響。

    據發現，Python 未正確處理某些輸入。攻擊者可能利用此問題執行任意程式碼。此問題僅影響 Ubuntu 14.04 LTS 和 Ubuntu 18.04 LTS。
    (CVE-2015-20107)

    據發現，Python 未正確使用容易受到災難性回溯影響的規則運算式。遠端攻擊者可能利用此問題引發拒絕服務。這個問題只會影響 Ubuntu 14.04 LTS。(CVE-2018-1060、CVE-2018-1061)

    據發現，Python 無法初始化 Expat 的雜湊 salt。遠端攻擊者可能會利用此問題，造成雜湊衝突，進而導致拒絕服務。這個問題只會影響 Ubuntu 14.04 LTS。(CVE-2018-14647)

    據發現，Python 未正確處理某些 pickle 檔案。攻擊者可能會利用此問題耗盡記憶體，進而導致拒絕服務。這個問題只會影響 Ubuntu 14.04 LTS。
    (CVE-2018-20406)

    據發現，Python 未在處理 cookie 時正確驗證網域。攻擊者可能誘騙 Python 將 cookie 傳送至錯誤網域。這個問題只會影響 Ubuntu 14.04 LTS。
    (CVE-2018-20852)

    Jonathan Birch 和 Panayiotis Panayiotou 發現，Python 未在 NFKC 正規化期間正確處理 Unicode 編碼。攻擊者可能會利用此問題取得敏感資訊。這個問題只會影響 Ubuntu 14.04 LTS。(CVE-2019-9636、CVE-2019-10160)

    據發現，Python 未正確剖析某些電子郵件地址。遠端攻擊者可能利用此問題，誘騙 Python 應用程式接受應該遭到拒絕的電子郵件地址。這個問題只會影響 Ubuntu 14.04 LTS。(CVE-2019-16056)

    據發現，Python 文件 XML-RPC 伺服器未正確處理某些欄位。遠端攻擊者可利用此問題發動跨網站指令碼 (XSS) 攻擊。這個問題只會影響 Ubuntu 14.04 LTS。(CVE-2019-16935)

    據發現，Python 文件有誤導資訊。錯誤假設此資訊可能造成安全性問題。此問題僅影響了 Ubuntu 14.04 LTS 和 Ubuntu 18.04 LTS。(CVE-2019-17514)

    據發現，Python 未正確將特定字元從要求中移除。遠端攻擊者可利用此問題執行 CRLF 插入。此問題僅影響了 Ubuntu 14.04 LTS 和 Ubuntu 18.04 LTS。(CVE-2019-18348)

    據發現，Python 未正確處理某些 TAR 封存。攻擊者可能利用此問題造成拒絕服務。此問題僅影響 Ubuntu 14.04 LTS 和 Ubuntu 18.04 LTS。
    (CVE-2019-20907)

    Colin Read 和 Nicolas Edet 發現 Python 未正確處理某些 X509 憑證的剖析作業。
    攻擊者可能利用此問題造成 Python 損毀，進而導致拒絕服務。這個問題只會影響 Ubuntu 14.04 LTS。(CVE-2019-5010)

    據發現，系統未正確處理某些 ZIP 檔案。攻擊者可能利用此問題造成拒絕服務。這個問題只會影響 Ubuntu 14.04 LTS。(CVE-2019-9674)

    據發現，Python 未正確處理某些 url。遠端攻擊者可能會利用此問題發動 CRLF 插入攻擊。這個問題只會影響 Ubuntu 14.04 LTS。(CVE-2019-9740、CVE-2019-9947)

    Sihoon Lee 發現，Python 未正確處理 local_file: scheme。遠端攻擊者可能利用此問題繞過封鎖清單機制。這個問題只會影響 Ubuntu 14.04 LTS。
    (CVE-2019-9948)

    據發現，Python 未正確處理某些 IP 值。攻擊者可能利用此問題造成拒絕服務。此問題僅影響 Ubuntu 14.04 LTS 和 Ubuntu 18.04 LTS。
    (CVE-2020-14422)

    據發現，Python 未正確處理某些字元序列。遠端攻擊者可能會利用此問題發動 CRLF 插入攻擊。此問題僅影響了 Ubuntu 14.04 LTS 和 Ubuntu 18.04 LTS。(CVE-2020-26116)

    據發現，Python 未正確處理某些輸入。攻擊者可能利用此問題執行任意程式碼，或造成拒絕服務。這個問題只會影響 Ubuntu 14.04 LTS。
    (CVE-2020-27619, CVE-2021-3177)

    據發現，Python 未正確處理某些 HTTP 要求。攻擊者可能利用此問題造成拒絕服務。這個問題只會影響 Ubuntu 14.04 LTS。(CVE-2020-8492)

    據發現，Python stdlib ipaddress API 未正確處理八進位字串。遠端攻擊者可能利用此問題發動多種攻擊，包括繞過特定存取限制。這個問題只會影響 Ubuntu 18.04 LTS。(CVE-2021-29921)

    David Schwrer 發現 Python 未正確處理某些輸入。攻擊者可能利用此問題洩漏敏感資訊。這個問題只會影響 Ubuntu 18.04 LTS。(CVE-2021-3426)

    據發現，Python 未正確處理某些 RCF。攻擊者可能利用此問題造成拒絕服務。這個問題只會影響 Ubuntu 14.04 LTS。(CVE-2021-3733)

    據發現，Python 未正確處理某些伺服器回應。攻擊者可能利用此問題造成拒絕服務。這個問題只會影響 Ubuntu 14.04 LTS。(CVE-2021-3737)

    據發現，Python 未正確處理某些 FTP 要求。攻擊者可能利用此問題洩漏敏感資訊。此問題僅影響了 Ubuntu 14.04 LTS 和 Ubuntu 18.04 LTS。(CVE-2021-4189)

    據發現，Python 未正確處理某些輸入。攻擊者可能利用此問題執行任意程式碼。此問題僅影響 Ubuntu 14.04 LTS 和 Ubuntu 18.04 LTS。
    (CVE-2022-0391)

    Devin Jeanpierre 發現，當系統正在使用多處理模組時，Python 未正確處理通訊端。本機攻擊者可能利用此問題執行任意程式碼，並提升權限。這個問題只會影響 Ubuntu 22.04 LTS。(CVE-2022-42919)

    據發現，Python 未正確處理某些輸入。如果使用者或自動化系統遭誘騙而開啟特製的輸入，遠端攻擊者可能利用此問題導致拒絕服務。此問題只影響 Ubuntu 14.04 LTS、Ubuntu 18.04 LTS 和 Ubuntu 22.04 LTS。
    (CVE-2022-45061, CVE-2023-24329)

    據發現，Python 未正確處理某些指令碼。攻擊者可能利用此問題執行任意程式碼或造成當機。此問題僅影響了 Ubuntu 14.04 LTS 和 Ubuntu 18.04 LTS。(CVE-2022-48560)

    據發現，Python 未正確處理某些 plist 檔案。如果使用者或自動化系統遭誘騙而處理特製的 plist 檔案，攻擊者可能利用此問題消耗資源，進而導致拒絕服務。此問題僅影響了 Ubuntu 14.04 LTS 和 Ubuntu 18.04 LTS。(CVE-2022-48564)

    據發現，Python 未正確處理 plist 檔案中的 XML 實體宣告。攻擊者可能利用此弱點執行 XML 外部實體 (XXE) 插入，導致拒絕服務或資訊洩漏。此問題僅影響了 Ubuntu 14.04 LTS 和 Ubuntu 18.04 LTS。(CVE-2022-48565)

    據發現，Python 未正確提供密碼編譯作業的常數時間處理。攻擊者可能會利用此問題執行定時攻擊並復原敏感資訊。此問題僅影響了 Ubuntu 14.04 LTS 和 Ubuntu 18.04 LTS。(CVE-2022-48566)

    據發現，Python 執行個體 ssl.SSLSocket 容易受到 TLS 交握繞過影響。
    攻擊者可能利用此問題，造成應用程式將 TLS 交握前收到的未經驗證資料，視為 TLS 交握後經驗證的資料。此問題只影響 Ubuntu 14.04 LTS、Ubuntu 18.04 LTS、Ubuntu 20.04 LTS 和 Ubuntu 22.04 LTS。(CVE-2023-40217)

    據發現，Python 在標準化路徑名稱時未正確處理 null 位元組。攻擊者可能會利用此問題繞過特定檔案名稱檢查。這個問題只會影響 Ubuntu 22.04 LTS。
    (CVE-2023-41105)

    據發現，Python 未正確處理某些參數的權限。攻擊者可能利用此問題，在啟動新處理程序之前，維護原始處理程序的群組。此問題只會影響 Ubuntu 23.10。(CVE-2023-6507)

    據發現，Python 未正確處理 temp 檔案中的符號連結。攻擊者可能會利用此問題修改檔案的權限。此問題僅影響了 Ubuntu 18.04 LTS、Ubuntu 20.04 LTS、Ubuntu 22.04 LTS 和 Ubuntu 23.10。(CVE-2023-6597)

    據發現，Python 未正確處理某些特製的 zip 檔案。攻擊者可能利用此問題造成程式損毀，進而導致拒絕服務。(CVE-2024-0450)

Tenable 已直接從 Ubuntu 安全公告擷取前置描述區塊。

請注意，Nessus 並未測試這些問題，而是僅依據應用程式自我報告的版本號碼作出判斷。

ID	名稱	產品	系列	已發布	已更新	嚴重性
197282	EulerOS Virtualization 3.0.6.0 : python2 (EulerOS-SA-2024-1697)	Nessus	Huawei Local Security Checks	2024/5/17	2024/5/17	critical
203866	Photon OS 3.0: Python3 PHSA-2023-3.0-0646	Nessus	PhotonOS Local Security Checks	2024/7/24	2024/7/24	critical
181767	Ubuntu 16.04 ESM : Python vulnerability (USN-6394-1)	Nessus	Ubuntu Local Security Checks	2023/9/21	2023/9/21	high
186678	Fedora 38 : python2.7 (2023-34a3a5adba)	Nessus	Fedora Local Security Checks	2023/12/7	2023/12/7	high
186679	Fedora 39 : python2.7 (2023-9954dae554)	Nessus	Fedora Local Security Checks	2023/12/7	2023/12/7	high
181697	Debian DLA-3575-1 : python2.7 - LTS security update	Nessus	Debian Local Security Checks	2023/9/20	2023/9/20	critical
202187	Ubuntu 14.04 LTS / 16.04 LTS / 18.04 LTS / 20.04 LTS / 22.04 LTS / 23.10 : Python vulnerabilities (USN-6891-1)	Nessus	Ubuntu Local Security Checks	2024/7/11	2024/7/11	critical
189784	RHEL 8：python3 (RHSA-2024: 0586)	Nessus	Red Hat Local Security Checks	2024/1/30	2024/6/3	medium
182942	Debian DLA-3614-1：python3.7 - LTS 安全性更新	Nessus	Debian Local Security Checks	2023/10/11	2023/10/11	critical
181767	Ubuntu 16.04 ESM：Python 弱點 (USN-6394-1)	Nessus	Ubuntu Local Security Checks	2023/9/21	2023/9/21	high
181697	Debian DLA-3575-1：python2.7 - LTS 安全性更新	Nessus	Debian Local Security Checks	2023/9/20	2023/9/20	critical
202187	Ubuntu 14.04 LTS / 16.04 LTS / 18.04 LTS / 20.04 LTS / 22.04 LTS / 23.10：Python 弱點 (USN-6891-1)	Nessus	Ubuntu Local Security Checks	2024/7/11	2024/7/11	critical

偵測

搜尋 Plugin

critical

critical

high

high

high

critical

critical

medium

critical

high

critical

critical