The version of Tomcat installed on the remote host is prior to 9.0.21. It is, therefore, affected by a vulnerability as referenced in the fixed_in_apache_tomcat_9.0.21_security-9 advisory.

  - If a web application sends a WebSocket message concurrently with the WebSocket connection closing when     running on Apache Tomcat 8.5.0 to 8.5.75 or Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.20, it is possible that the     application will continue to use the socket after it has been closed. The error handling triggered in this     case could cause the a pooled object to be placed in the pool twice. This could result in subsequent     connections using the same object concurrently which could result in data being returned to the wrong use     and/or other errors. (CVE-2022-25762)

Note that Nessus has not tested for this issue but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version number.

The version of Tomcat installed on the remote host is prior to 8.5.76. It is, therefore, affected by a vulnerability as referenced in the fixed_in_apache_tomcat_8.5.76_security-8 advisory.

  - If a web application sends a WebSocket message concurrently with the WebSocket connection closing when     running on Apache Tomcat 8.5.0 to 8.5.75 or Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.20, it is possible that the     application will continue to use the socket after it has been closed. The error handling triggered in this     case could cause the a pooled object to be placed in the pool twice. This could result in subsequent     connections using the same object concurrently which could result in data being returned to the wrong use     and/or other errors. (CVE-2022-25762)

Note that Nessus has not tested for this issue but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version number.

The version of tomcat8 installed on the remote host is prior to 8.5.81-1.91. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities as referenced in the ALAS-2022-1627 advisory.

    A flaw was found in the tomcat package. When a web application sends a WebSocket message concurrently with     the WebSocket connection closing, the application may continue to use the socket after it has been closed.
    In this case, the error handling triggered could cause the pooled object to be placed in the pool twice.
    This issue results in subsequent connections using the same object concurrently, which causes data to be     potentially returned to the wrong user or application stability issues. (CVE-2022-25762)

    The documentation of Apache Tomcat 10.1.0-M1 to 10.1.0-M14, 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.20, 9.0.13 to 9.0.62 and     8.5.38 to 8.5.78 for the EncryptInterceptor incorrectly stated it enabled Tomcat clustering to run over an     untrusted network. This was not correct. While the EncryptInterceptor does provide confidentiality and     integrity protection, it does not protect against all risks associated with running over any untrusted     network, particularly DoS risks. (CVE-2022-29885)

Tenable has extracted the preceding description block directly from the tested product security advisory.

Note that Nessus has not tested for these issues but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version number.

The version of AOS installed on the remote host is prior to 5.20.4.5. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities as referenced in the NXSA-AOS-5.20.4.5 advisory.

  - If a web application sends a WebSocket message concurrently with the WebSocket connection closing when     running on Apache Tomcat 8.5.0 to 8.5.75 or Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.20, it is possible that the     application will continue to use the socket after it has been closed. The error handling triggered in this     case could cause the a pooled object to be placed in the pool twice. This could result in subsequent     connections using the same object concurrently which could result in data being returned to the wrong use     and/or other errors. (CVE-2022-25762)

  - An arbitrary file write vulnerability was found in GNU gzip's zgrep utility. When zgrep is applied on the     attacker's chosen file name (for example, a crafted file name), this can overwrite an attacker's content     to an arbitrary attacker-selected file. This flaw occurs due to insufficient validation when processing     filenames with two or more newlines where selected content and the target file names are embedded in     crafted multi-line file names. This flaw allows a remote, low privileged attacker to force zgrep to write     arbitrary files on the system. (CVE-2022-1271)

  - The documentation of Apache Tomcat 10.1.0-M1 to 10.1.0-M14, 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.20, 9.0.13 to 9.0.62 and     8.5.38 to 8.5.78 for the EncryptInterceptor incorrectly stated it enabled Tomcat clustering to run over an     untrusted network. This was not correct. While the EncryptInterceptor does provide confidentiality and     integrity protection, it does not protect against all risks associated with running over any untrusted     network, particularly DoS risks. (CVE-2022-29885)

  - zlib before 1.2.12 allows memory corruption when deflating (i.e., when compressing) if the input has many     distant matches. (CVE-2018-25032)

  - A vulnerability was found in the Linux kernel's cgroup_release_agent_write in the     kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c function. This flaw, under certain circumstances, allows the use of the cgroups     v1 release_agent feature to escalate privileges and bypass the namespace isolation unexpectedly.
    (CVE-2022-0492)

Note that Nessus has not tested for these issues but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version number.

ID	名稱	產品	系列	已發布	已更新	嚴重性
161159	Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 < 9.0.21	Nessus	Web Servers	2022/5/13	2024/5/23	high
161181	Apache Tomcat 8.5.0 < 8.5.76	Nessus	Web Servers	2022/5/13	2024/5/23	high
163869	Amazon Linux AMI : tomcat8 (ALAS-2022-1627)	Nessus	Amazon Linux Local Security Checks	2022/8/5	2024/12/11	high
164613	Nutanix AOS : Multiple Vulnerabilities (NXSA-AOS-5.20.4.5)	Nessus	Misc.	2022/9/1	2026/6/3	high

偵測

搜尋 Plugin

high

high

high

high