Linux/Unix 主機上安裝了一個或多個受到弱點影響的套件，且供應商未提供可用的修補程式。

  - Artifex Ghostscript 9.25 及更舊版本讓攻擊者得以透過涉及錯誤處理程式設定的向量來繞過沙箱保護機制。注意：此問題之所以存在，是因為 CVE-2018-17183 的修正不完整。
    (CVE-2018-17961)

請注意，Nessus 依賴供應商報告的套件存在。

這是 Tavis Ormandy 報告的最近發現的 -dSAFER 問題的後續更新。Tavis Ormandy 在 PostScript 語言解譯程式 Ghostscript 中發現數個弱點，如果處理格式錯誤的 Postscript 檔案，可導致拒絕服務、建立檔案或任意程式碼執行 (儘管已啟用 dSAFER 沙箱)。針對 Debian 8「Jessie」，這些問題已在 9.06~dfsg-2+deb8u11 版本中修正。建議您升級 ghostscript 套件。注意：Tenable Network Security 已直接從 DLA 安全性公告擷取前置描述區塊。Tenable 已盡量在不造成其他問題的前提下，嘗試自動清理並將其格式化。

來自 Red Hat 安全性公告 2018:3834：

現已提供適用於 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 的 ghostscript 更新。

Red Hat 產品安全性團隊已將此更新評等為具有「重要」安全性影響。可從〈參照〉一節的 CVE 連結中取得每個弱點之常見弱點評分系統 (CVSS) 的基本分數，其中包含有關嚴重性評等的詳細資訊。

Ghostscript 套件含有用於轉譯 PostScript 和 PDF 文件的公用程式。Ghostscript 可將 PostScript 程式碼轉譯為常見的點陣圖格式，以便於顯示或列印程式碼。

安全性修正：

* ghostscript：頁面裝置更換時釋放邏輯不正確 (699664) (CVE-2018-16541)

* ghostscript：當異常處理期間堆疊用完時，「特權還原」檢查不正確 (CVE-2018-16802)

* ghostscript：User-writable 錯誤異常表 (CVE-2018-17183)

* ghostscript：已儲存的執行堆疊可能洩露運算子陣列 (CVE-2018-17183 修正不完整) (CVE-2018-17961)

* ghostscript：已儲存的執行堆疊可能洩露運算子陣列 (CVE-2018-18073)

* ghostscript：1Policy 運算子允許繞過沙箱保護機制 (CVE-2018-18284)

* ghostscript：setpattern 中的類型混淆 (700141) (CVE-2018-19134)

* ghostscript：在 psi/zdevice.c 中執行 zsetdevice 函式安全檢查的方式不正確 (CVE-2018-19409)

* ghostscript：在 aesdecode 運算子中發生未初始化的記憶體存取 (699665) (CVE-2018-15911)

如需安全性問題的詳細資料，包括影響、CVSS 分數及其他相關資訊，請參閱〈參照〉一節列出的 CVE 頁面。

Red Hat 感謝 Tavis Ormandy (Google Project Zero) 報告 CVE-2018-16541 。

錯誤修正：

* 據發現，ghostscript-9.07-31.el7_6.1 在處理陰影物件期間引起迴歸，進而造成「丟棄不正確的平滑陰影物件」警告。透過此更新，迴歸已經過修正，因此上述問題不會再發生。
(BZ#1657822)

The remote Redhat Enterprise Linux 7 host has packages installed that are affected by multiple vulnerabilities as referenced in the RHSA-2018:3834 advisory.

  - ghostscript: Uninitialized memory access in the aesdecode operator (699665) (CVE-2018-15911)

  - ghostscript: Incorrect free logic in pagedevice replacement (699664) (CVE-2018-16541)

  - ghostscript: Incorrect restoration of privilege checking when running out of stack during exception     handling (CVE-2018-16802)

  - ghostscript: User-writable error exception table (CVE-2018-17183)

  - ghostscript: Saved execution stacks can leak operator arrays (incomplete fix for CVE-2018-17183)     (CVE-2018-17961)

  - ghostscript: Saved execution stacks can leak operator arrays (CVE-2018-18073)

  - ghostscript: 1Policy operator allows a sandbox protection bypass (CVE-2018-18284)

  - ghostscript: Type confusion in setpattern (700141) (CVE-2018-19134)

  - ghostscript: Improperly implemented security check in zsetdevice function in psi/zdevice.c     (CVE-2018-19409)

Note that Nessus has not tested for these issues but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version number.

An update for ghostscript is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.

Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having a security impact of Important. A Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base score, which gives a detailed severity rating, is available for each vulnerability from the CVE link(s) in the References section.

The Ghostscript suite contains utilities for rendering PostScript and PDF documents. Ghostscript translates PostScript code to common bitmap formats so that the code can be displayed or printed.

Security Fix(es) :

* ghostscript: Incorrect free logic in pagedevice replacement (699664) (CVE-2018-16541)

* ghostscript: Incorrect 'restoration of privilege' checking when running out of stack during exception handling (CVE-2018-16802)

* ghostscript: User-writable error exception table (CVE-2018-17183)

* ghostscript: Saved execution stacks can leak operator arrays (incomplete fix for CVE-2018-17183) (CVE-2018-17961)

* ghostscript: Saved execution stacks can leak operator arrays (CVE-2018-18073)

* ghostscript: 1Policy operator allows a sandbox protection bypass (CVE-2018-18284)

* ghostscript: Type confusion in setpattern (700141) (CVE-2018-19134)

* ghostscript: Improperly implemented security check in zsetdevice function in psi/zdevice.c (CVE-2018-19409)

* ghostscript: Uninitialized memory access in the aesdecode operator (699665) (CVE-2018-15911)

For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.

Red Hat would like to thank Tavis Ormandy (Google Project Zero) for reporting CVE-2018-16541.

Bug Fix(es) :

* It has been found that ghostscript-9.07-31.el7_6.1 introduced regression during the handling of shading objects, causing a 'Dropping incorrect smooth shading object' warning. With this update, the regression has been fixed and the described problem no longer occurs.
(BZ#1657822)

According to the versions of the ghostscript packages installed, the EulerOS installation on the remote host is affected by the following vulnerabilities :

  - ghostscript: Incorrect 'restoration of privilege'     checking when running out of stack during exception     handling (CVE-2018-16802)

  - ghostscript: User-writable error exception table     (CVE-2018-17183)

  - ghostscript: Saved execution stacks can leak operator     arrays (incomplete fix for CVE-2018-17183)     (CVE-2018-17961)

  - ghostscript: Saved execution stacks can leak operator     arrays (CVE-2018-18073)

  - ghostscript: 1Policy operator allows a sandbox     protection bypass (CVE-2018-18284)

  - ghostscript: Type confusion in setpattern (700141)     (CVE-2018-19134)

  - ghostscript: Improperly implemented security check in     zsetdevice function in psi/zdevice.c (CVE-2018-19409)

  - ghostscript: Uninitialized memory access in the     aesdecode operator (699665) (CVE-2018-15911)

  - ghostscript: incomplete fix for CVE-2018-16509     (CVE-2018-16863)

  - ghostscript: gssetresolution and gsgetresolution memory     corruption(CVE-2018-16543)

  - ghostscript: use-after-free in copydevice     handling(CVE-2018-16540)

Note that Tenable Network Security has extracted the preceding description block directly from the EulerOS security advisory. Tenable has attempted to automatically clean and format it as much as possible without introducing additional issues.

According to the versions of the ghostscript package installed, the EulerOS Virtualization installation on the remote host is affected by the following vulnerabilities :

  - It was discovered that ghostscript did not properly     verify the key used in aesdecode. An attacker could     possibly exploit this to bypass the -dSAFER protection     and crash ghostscript or, possibly, execute arbitrary     code in the ghostscript context via a specially crafted     PostScript document.i1/4^CVE-2018-15911i1/4%0

  - An issue was discovered in Artifex Ghostscript before     9.25. Incorrect 'restoration of privilege' checking     when running out of stack during exception handling     could be used by attackers able to supply crafted     PostScript to execute code using the 'pipe'     instruction. This is due to an incomplete fix for     CVE-2018-16509.i1/4^CVE-2018-16802i1/4%0

  - It was found that RHSA-2018:2918 did not fully fix     CVE-2018-16509. An attacker could possibly exploit     another variant of the flaw and bypass the -dSAFER     protection to, for example, execute arbitrary shell     commands via a specially crafted PostScript     document.i1/4^CVE-2018-16863i1/4%0

  - Artifex Ghostscript before 9.25 allowed a user-writable     error exception table, which could be used by remote     attackers able to supply crafted PostScript to     potentially overwrite or replace error handlers to     inject code.i1/4^CVE-2018-17183i1/4%0

  - Artifex Ghostscript 9.25 and earlier allows attackers     to bypass a sandbox protection mechanism via vectors     involving errorhandler setup. NOTE: this issue exists     because of an incomplete fix for     CVE-2018-17183.i1/4^CVE-2018-17961i1/4%0

  - Artifex Ghostscript allows attackers to bypass a     sandbox protection mechanism by leveraging exposure of     system operators in the saved execution stack in an     error object.i1/4^CVE-2018-18073i1/4%0

  - Artifex Ghostscript 9.25 and earlier allows attackers     to bypass a sandbox protection mechanism via vectors     involving the 1Policy operator.i1/4^CVE-2018-18284i1/4%0

  - In Artifex Ghostscript through 9.25, the setpattern     operator did not properly validate certain types. A     specially crafted PostScript document could exploit     this to crash Ghostscript or, possibly, execute     arbitrary code in the context of the Ghostscript     process. This is a type confusion issue because of     failure to check whether the Implementation of a     pattern dictionary was a structure     type.i1/4^CVE-2018-19134i1/4%0

  - An issue was discovered in Artifex Ghostscript before     9.26. LockSafetyParams is not checked correctly if     another device is used.i1/4^CVE-2018-19409i1/4%0

Note that Tenable Network Security has extracted the preceding description block directly from the EulerOS security advisory. Tenable has attempted to automatically clean and format it as much as possible without introducing additional issues.

According to the versions of the ghostscript package installed, the EulerOS Virtualization installation on the remote host is affected by the following vulnerabilities :

  - It was discovered that the ghostscript .tempfile     function did not properly handle file permissions. An     attacker could possibly exploit this to exploit this to     bypass the -dSAFER protection and delete files or     disclose their content via a specially crafted     PostScript document.i1/4^CVE-2018-15908i1/4%0

  - It was discovered that the ghostscript .shfill operator     did not properly validate certain types. An attacker     could possibly exploit this to bypass the -dSAFER     protection and crash ghostscript or, possibly, execute     arbitrary code in the ghostscript context via a     specially crafted PostScript     document.i1/4^CVE-2018-15909i1/4%0

  - It was discovered that ghostscript did not properly     verify the key used in aesdecode. An attacker could     possibly exploit this to bypass the -dSAFER protection     and crash ghostscript or, possibly, execute arbitrary     code in the ghostscript context via a specially crafted     PostScript document.i1/4^CVE-2018-15911i1/4%0

  - It was discovered that the ghostscript .type operator     did not properly validate its operands. A specially     crafted PostScript document could exploit this to crash     ghostscript or, possibly, execute arbitrary code in the     context of the ghostscript process.i1/4^CVE-2018-16511i1/4%0

  - It was discovered that the ghostscript did not properly     restrict access to files open prior to enabling the
    -dSAFER mode. An attacker could possibly exploit this     to bypass the -dSAFER protection and disclose the     content of affected files via a specially crafted     PostScript document.i1/4^CVE-2018-16539i1/4%0

  - It was discovered that the ghostscript device cleanup     did not properly handle devices replaced with a null     device. An attacker could possibly exploit this to     bypass the -dSAFER protection and crash ghostscript or,     possibly, execute arbitrary code in the ghostscript     context via a specially crafted PostScript     document.i1/4^CVE-2018-16541i1/4%0

  - An issue was discovered in Artifex Ghostscript before     9.25. Incorrect 'restoration of privilege' checking     when running out of stack during exception handling     could be used by attackers able to supply crafted     PostScript to execute code using the 'pipe'     instruction. This is due to an incomplete fix for     CVE-2018-16509.i1/4^CVE-2018-16802i1/4%0

  - It was found that RHSA-2018:2918 did not fully fix     CVE-2018-16509. An attacker could possibly exploit     another variant of the flaw and bypass the -dSAFER     protection to, for example, execute arbitrary shell     commands via a specially crafted PostScript     document.i1/4^CVE-2018-16863i1/4%0

  - Artifex Ghostscript before 9.25 allowed a user-writable     error exception table, which could be used by remote     attackers able to supply crafted PostScript to     potentially overwrite or replace error handlers to     inject code.i1/4^CVE-2018-17183i1/4%0

  - Artifex Ghostscript 9.25 and earlier allows attackers     to bypass a sandbox protection mechanism via vectors     involving errorhandler setup. NOTE: this issue exists     because of an incomplete fix for     CVE-2018-17183.i1/4^CVE-2018-17961i1/4%0

  - Artifex Ghostscript allows attackers to bypass a     sandbox protection mechanism by leveraging exposure of     system operators in the saved execution stack in an     error object.i1/4^CVE-2018-18073i1/4%0

  - Artifex Ghostscript 9.25 and earlier allows attackers     to bypass a sandbox protection mechanism via vectors     involving the 1Policy operator.i1/4^CVE-2018-18284i1/4%0

  - In Artifex Ghostscript through 9.25, the setpattern     operator did not properly validate certain types. A     specially crafted PostScript document could exploit     this to crash Ghostscript or, possibly, execute     arbitrary code in the context of the Ghostscript     process. This is a type confusion issue because of     failure to check whether the Implementation of a     pattern dictionary was a structure     type.i1/4^CVE-2018-19134i1/4%0

  - An issue was discovered in Artifex Ghostscript before     9.26. LockSafetyParams is not checked correctly if     another device is used.i1/4^CVE-2018-19409i1/4%0

Note that Tenable Network Security has extracted the preceding description block directly from the EulerOS security advisory. Tenable has attempted to automatically clean and format it as much as possible without introducing additional issues.

This update for ghostscript to version 9.26 fixes the following issues :

Security issues fixed :

CVE-2018-19475: Fixed bypass of an intended access restriction in psi/zdevice2.c (bsc#1117327)

CVE-2018-19476: Fixed bypass of an intended access restriction in psi/zicc.c (bsc#1117313)

CVE-2018-19477: Fixed bypass of an intended access restriction in psi/zfjbig2.c (bsc#1117274)

CVE-2018-19409: Check if another device is used correctly in LockSafetyParams (bsc#1117022)

CVE-2018-18284: Fixed potential sandbox escape through 1Policy operator (bsc#1112229)

CVE-2018-18073: Fixed leaks through operator in saved execution stacks (bsc#1111480)

CVE-2018-17961: Fixed a -dSAFER sandbox escape by bypassing executeonly (bsc#1111479)

CVE-2018-17183: Fixed a potential code injection by specially crafted PostScript files (bsc#1109105)

Version update to 9.26 (bsc#1117331): Security issues have been the primary focus

Minor bug fixes and improvements

For release summary see: http://www.ghostscript.com/doc/9.26/News.htm

Note that Tenable Network Security has extracted the preceding description block directly from the SUSE security advisory. Tenable has attempted to automatically clean and format it as much as possible without introducing additional issues.

- rebase to latest upstream version 9.26

  - Security fix for CVE-2018-19478 CVE-2018-19134     CVE-2018-19477 CVE-2018-19476 CVE-2018-19475     CVE-2018-19409 CVE-2018-18284 CVE-2018-18073     CVE-2018-17961

Note that Tenable Network Security has extracted the preceding description block directly from the Fedora update system website.
Tenable has attempted to automatically clean and format it as much as possible without introducing additional issues.

The version of ghostscript installed on the remote host is prior to 9.25-5. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities as referenced in the ALAS2-2021-1598 advisory.

    Artifex Ghostscript before 9.25 allowed a user-writable error exception table, which could be used by     remote attackers able to supply crafted PostScript to potentially overwrite or replace error handlers to     inject code. (CVE-2018-17183)

    Artifex Ghostscript 9.25 and earlier allows attackers to bypass a sandbox protection mechanism via vectors     involving errorhandler setup. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix forCVE-2018-17183.
    (CVE-2018-17961)

    Artifex Ghostscript allows attackers to bypass a sandbox protection mechanism by leveraging exposure of     system operators in the saved execution stack in an error object. (CVE-2018-18073)

    Artifex Ghostscript 9.25 and earlier allows attackers to bypass a sandbox protection mechanism via vectors     involving the 1Policy operator. (CVE-2018-18284)

    In Artifex Ghostscript through 9.25, the setpattern operator did not properly validate certain types. A     specially crafted PostScript document could exploit this to crash Ghostscript or, possibly, execute     arbitrary code in the context of the Ghostscript process. This is a type confusion issue because of     failure to check whether the Implementation of a pattern dictionary was a structure type. (CVE-2018-19134)

    An issue was discovered in Artifex Ghostscript before 9.26. LockSafetyParams is not checked correctly if     another device is used. (CVE-2018-19409)

    psi/zdevice2.c in Artifex Ghostscript before 9.26 allows remote attackers to bypass intended access     restrictions because available stack space is not checked when the device remains the same.
    (CVE-2018-19475)

    psi/zicc.c in Artifex Ghostscript before 9.26 allows remote attackers to bypass intended access     restrictions because of a setcolorspace type confusion. (CVE-2018-19476)

    psi/zfjbig2.c in Artifex Ghostscript before 9.26 allows remote attackers to bypass intended access     restrictions because of a JBIG2Decode type confusion. (CVE-2018-19477)

    A flaw was found in the .pdf_hook_DSC_Creator procedure where it did not properly secure its privileged     calls, enabling scripts to bypass `-dSAFER` restrictions. A specially crafted PostScript file could     disable security protection and then have access to the file system, or execute arbitrary commands.
    (CVE-2019-14811)

    A flaw was found in the .setuserparams2 procedure where it did not properly secure its privileged calls,     enabling scripts to bypass `-dSAFER` restrictions. A specially crafted PostScript file could disable     security protection and then have access to the file system, or execute arbitrary commands.
    (CVE-2019-14812)

    A flaw was found in the setsystemparams procedure where it did not properly secure its privileged calls,     enabling scripts to bypass `-dSAFER` restrictions. A specially crafted PostScript file could disable     security protection and then have access to the file system, or execute arbitrary commands.
    (CVE-2019-14813)

    A flaw was found in the .pdfexectoken and other procedures where it did not properly secure its privileged     calls, enabling scripts to bypass `-dSAFER` restrictions. A specially crafted PostScript file could     disable security protection and then have access to the file system, or execute arbitrary commands.
    (CVE-2019-14817)

    A flaw was found in the `.charkeys` procedure, where it did not properly secure its privileged calls,     enabling scripts to bypass `-dSAFER` restrictions. An attacker could abuse this flaw by creating a     specially crafted PostScript file that could escalate privileges within the Ghostscript and access files     outside of restricted areas or execute commands. (CVE-2019-14869)

    It was found that the superexec operator was available in the internal dictionary.  A specially crafted     PostScript file could use this flaw in order to, for example, have access to the file system outside of     the constrains imposed by -dSAFER. (CVE-2019-3835)

    It was found that the forceput operator could be extracted from the DefineResource method. A specially     crafted PostScript file could use this flaw in order to, for example, have access to the file system     outside of the constrains imposed by -dSAFER. (CVE-2019-3838)

    It was found that some privileged operators remained accessible from various places after     theCVE-2019-6116fix. A specially crafted PostScript file could use this flaw in order to, for example,     have access to the file system outside of the constrains imposed by -dSAFER. (CVE-2019-3839)

    It was found that ghostscript could leak sensitive operators on the operand stack when a pseudo-operator     pushes a subroutine. A specially crafted PostScript file could use this flaw to escape the -dSAFER     protection in order to, for example, have access to the file system outside of the SAFER constraints.
    (CVE-2019-6116)

Tenable has extracted the preceding description block directly from the tested product security advisory.

Note that Nessus has not tested for these issues but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version number.

According to the versions of the ghostscript package installed, the EulerOS Virtualization installation on the remote host is affected by the following vulnerabilities :

  - It was discovered that the ghostscript .tempfile     function did not properly handle file permissions. An     attacker could possibly exploit this to exploit this to     bypass the -dSAFER protection and delete files or     disclose their content via a specially crafted     PostScript document.i1/4^CVE-2018-15908i1/4%0

  - It was discovered that the ghostscript .shfill operator     did not properly validate certain types. An attacker     could possibly exploit this to bypass the -dSAFER     protection and crash ghostscript or, possibly, execute     arbitrary code in the ghostscript context via a     specially crafted PostScript     document.i1/4^CVE-2018-15909i1/4%0

  - It was discovered that ghostscript did not properly     verify the key used in aesdecode. An attacker could     possibly exploit this to bypass the -dSAFER protection     and crash ghostscript or, possibly, execute arbitrary     code in the ghostscript context via a specially crafted     PostScript document.i1/4^CVE-2018-15911i1/4%0

  - It was discovered that the ghostscript .type operator     did not properly validate its operands. A specially     crafted PostScript document could exploit this to crash     ghostscript or, possibly, execute arbitrary code in the     context of the ghostscript process.i1/4^CVE-2018-16511i1/4%0

  - It was discovered that the ghostscript did not properly     restrict access to files open prior to enabling the
    -dSAFER mode. An attacker could possibly exploit this     to bypass the -dSAFER protection and disclose the     content of affected files via a specially crafted     PostScript document.i1/4^CVE-2018-16539i1/4%0

  - It was discovered that the ghostscript device cleanup     did not properly handle devices replaced with a null     device. An attacker could possibly exploit this to     bypass the -dSAFER protection and crash ghostscript or,     possibly, execute arbitrary code in the ghostscript     context via a specially crafted PostScript     document.i1/4^CVE-2018-16541i1/4%0

  - An issue was discovered in Artifex Ghostscript before     9.25. Incorrect 'restoration of privilege' checking     when running out of stack during exception handling     could be used by attackers able to supply crafted     PostScript to execute code using the 'pipe'     instruction. This is due to an incomplete fix for     CVE-2018-16509.i1/4^CVE-2018-16802i1/4%0

  - It was found that RHSA-2018:2918 did not fully fix     CVE-2018-16509. An attacker could possibly exploit     another variant of the flaw and bypass the -dSAFER     protection to, for example, execute arbitrary shell     commands via a specially crafted PostScript     document.i1/4^CVE-2018-16863i1/4%0

  - Artifex Ghostscript before 9.25 allowed a user-writable     error exception table, which could be used by remote     attackers able to supply crafted PostScript to     potentially overwrite or replace error handlers to     inject code.i1/4^CVE-2018-17183i1/4%0

  - Artifex Ghostscript 9.25 and earlier allows attackers     to bypass a sandbox protection mechanism via vectors     involving errorhandler setup. NOTE: this issue exists     because of an incomplete fix for     CVE-2018-17183.i1/4^CVE-2018-17961i1/4%0

  - Artifex Ghostscript allows attackers to bypass a     sandbox protection mechanism by leveraging exposure of     system operators in the saved execution stack in an     error object.i1/4^CVE-2018-18073i1/4%0

  - Artifex Ghostscript 9.25 and earlier allows attackers     to bypass a sandbox protection mechanism via vectors     involving the 1Policy operator.i1/4^CVE-2018-18284i1/4%0

  - In Artifex Ghostscript through 9.25, the setpattern     operator did not properly validate certain types. A     specially crafted PostScript document could exploit     this to crash Ghostscript or, possibly, execute     arbitrary code in the context of the Ghostscript     process. This is a type confusion issue because of     failure to check whether the Implementation of a     pattern dictionary was a structure     type.i1/4^CVE-2018-19134i1/4%0

  - An issue was discovered in Artifex Ghostscript before     9.26. LockSafetyParams is not checked correctly if     another device is used.i1/4^CVE-2018-19409i1/4%0

  - It was discovered that ghostscript did not properly     handle certain stack overflow error conditions. An     attacker could possibly exploit this to bypass the
    -dSAFER protection and crash ghostscript or, possibly,     execute arbitrary code in the ghostscript context via a     specially crafted PostScript     document.i1/4^CVE-2018-16542i1/4%0

  - It was discovered that the type of the     LockDistillerParams parameter is not properly verified.
    An attacker could possibly exploit this to bypass the
    -dSAFER protection and crash ghostscript or, possibly,     execute arbitrary code in the ghostscript context via a     specially crafted PostScript     document.i1/4^CVE-2018-15910i1/4%0

Note that Tenable Network Security has extracted the preceding description block directly from the EulerOS security advisory. Tenable has attempted to automatically clean and format it as much as possible without introducing additional issues.

ID	名稱	產品	系列	已發布	已更新	嚴重性
222068	Linux Distros 未修補弱點：CVE-2018-17961	Nessus	Misc.	2025/3/4	2025/9/2	high
118313	Debian DLA-1552-1：ghostscript 安全性更新	Nessus	Debian Local Security Checks	2018/10/23	2024/7/29	high
119757	Oracle Linux 7：ghostscript (ELSA-2018-3834)	Nessus	Oracle Linux Local Security Checks	2018/12/19	2024/11/1	critical
119736	RHEL 7 : ghostscript (RHSA-2018:3834)	Nessus	Red Hat Local Security Checks	2018/12/18	2024/4/27	critical
119754	CentOS 7 : ghostscript (CESA-2018:3834)	Nessus	CentOS Local Security Checks	2018/12/19	2020/8/21	critical
122169	EulerOS 2.0 SP3 : ghostscript (EulerOS-SA-2019-1022)	Nessus	Huawei Local Security Checks	2019/2/14	2022/5/23	critical
123895	EulerOS Virtualization 2.5.4 : ghostscript (EulerOS-SA-2019-1209)	Nessus	Huawei Local Security Checks	2019/4/9	2022/5/20	critical
123891	EulerOS Virtualization 2.5.3 : ghostscript (EulerOS-SA-2019-1205)	Nessus	Huawei Local Security Checks	2019/4/9	2022/5/20	critical
119651	SUSE SLED12 / SLES12 Security Update : ghostscript (SUSE-SU-2018:4090-1)	Nessus	SuSE Local Security Checks	2018/12/13	2024/7/16	critical
120186	SUSE SLED15 / SLES15 Security Update : ghostscript (SUSE-SU-2018:4087-1)	Nessus	SuSE Local Security Checks	2019/1/2	2024/7/9	critical
122284	Fedora 28 : ghostscript (2019-82acb29c1b)	Nessus	Fedora Local Security Checks	2019/2/19	2024/6/20	critical
146633	Amazon Linux 2 : ghostscript (ALAS-2021-1598)	Nessus	Amazon Linux Local Security Checks	2021/2/19	2024/12/11	critical
121276	EulerOS Virtualization 2.5.1 : ghostscript (EulerOS-SA-2019-1016)	Nessus	Huawei Local Security Checks	2019/1/22	2022/5/24	critical

偵測

搜尋 Plugin

high

high

critical

critical

critical

critical

critical

critical

critical

critical

critical

critical

critical