遠端 MiracleLinux 8 主機已安裝受到多個弱點影響的套件如 AXSA:2024-9035:37 公告中所提及。

    CVE-2023-6040 CVE-2024-26595 CVE-2024-26600 CVE-2021-46984 CVE-2023-52478 CVE-2023-52476 CVE-2023-52522 CVE-2021-47101 CVE-2021-47097 CVE-2023-52605 CVE-2024-26638 CVE-2024-26645 CVE-2024-26665 CVE-2024-26720 CVE-2024-26717 CVE-2024-26769 CVE-2024-26846 CVE-2024-26894 CVE-2024-26880 CVE-2024-26855 CVE-2024-26923 CVE-2024-26939 CVE-2024-27013 CVE-2024-27042 CVE-2024-35809 CVE-2023-52683 CVE-2024-35884 CVE-2024-35877 CVE-2024-35944 CVE-2024-35989 CVE-2021-47412 CVE-2021-47393 CVE-2021-47386 CVE-2021-47385 CVE-2021-47384 CVE-2021-47383 CVE-2021-47432 CVE-2021-47352 CVE-2021-47338 CVE-2021-47321 CVE-2021-47289 CVE-2021-47287 CVE-2023-52798 CVE-2023-52809 CVE-2023-52817 CVE-2023-52840 CVE-2023-52800 CVE-2021-47441 CVE-2021-47466 CVE-2021-47455 CVE-2021-47497 CVE-2021-47560 CVE-2021-47527 CVE-2024-36883 CVE-2024-36922 CVE-2024-36920 CVE-2024-36902 CVE-2024-36953 CVE-2024-36939 CVE-2024-36919 CVE-2024-36901 CVE-2021-47582 CVE-2021-47609 CVE-2024-38619 CVE-2022-48754 CVE-2022-48760 CVE-2024-38581 CVE-2024-38579 CVE-2024-38570 CVE-2024-38559 CVE-2024-38558 CVE-2024-37356 CVE-2024-39471 CVE-2024-39499 CVE-2024-39501 CVE-2024-39506 CVE-2024-40904 CVE-2024-40911 CVE-2024-40912 CVE-2024-40929 CVE-2024-40931 CVE-2024-40941 CVE-2024-40954 CVE-2024-40958 CVE-2024-40959 CVE-2024-40960 CVE-2024-40972 CVE-2024-40977 CVE-2024-40978 CVE-2024-40988 CVE-2024-40989 CVE-2024-40995 CVE-2024-40997 CVE-2024-40998 CVE-2024-41005 CVE-2024-40901 CVE-2024-41007 CVE-2024-41008 CVE-2022-48804 CVE-2022-48836 CVE-2022-48866 CVE-2024-41090 CVE-2024-41091 CVE-2024-41012 CVE-2024-41013 CVE-2024-41014 CVE-2024-41023 CVE-2024-41035 CVE-2024-41038 CVE-2024-41039 CVE-2024-41040 CVE-2024-41041 CVE-2024-41044 CVE-2024-41055 CVE-2024-41056 CVE-2024-41060 CVE-2024-41064 CVE-2024-41065 CVE-2024-41071 CVE-2024-41076 CVE-2024-41097 CVE-2024-42084 CVE-2024-42090 CVE-2024-42094 CVE-2024-42096 CVE-2024-42114 CVE-2024-42124 CVE-2024-42131 CVE-2024-42152 CVE-2024-42154 CVE-2024-42225 CVE-2024-42226 CVE-2024-42228 CVE-2024-42237 CVE-2024-42238 CVE-2024-42240 CVE-2024-42246 CVE-2024-42322 CVE-2024-43830 CVE-2024-43871

Tenable 已直接從 MiracleLinux 安全性公告擷取前置描述區塊。

請注意，Nessus 並未測試這些問題，而是僅依據應用程式自我報告的版本號碼作出判斷。

CentOS Linux 8 主機安裝的套件受到 TuxCare CENTOS-STREAM8：CLSA-2024：1727815919 公告中提及的多個漏洞影響。

  - 已解決 Linux 核心中的下列弱點：Input: elantech - fix stack out of bound access in elantech_change_report_id() The array param[] in elantech_change_report_id() must be at least 3 bytes, because elantech_read_reg_params() is calling ps2_command() with PSMOUSE_CMD_GETINFO, that is going to access 3 bytes from param[], but it's defined in the stack as an array of 2 bytes, therefore we have a potential stack out-of-bounds access here, also confirmed by KASAN: [ 6.512374] BUG: KASAN:
    stack-out-of-bounds in __ps2_command+0x372/0x7e0 [ 6.512397] Read of size 1 at addr ffff8881024d77c2 by task kworker/2:1/118 [ 6.512416] CPU: 2 PID: 118 Comm: kworker/2:1 Not tainted 5.13.0-22-generic #22+arighi20211110 [ 6.512428] Hardware name: LENOVO 20T8000QGE/20T8000QGE, BIOS R1AET32W (1.08 ) 08/14/2020 [ 6.512436] Workqueue: events_long serio_handle_event [ 6.512453] Call Trace: [ 6.512462] show_stack+0x52/0x58 [ 6.512474] dump_stack+0xa1/0xd3 [ 6.512487] print_address_description.constprop.0+0x1d/0x140 [ 6.512502] ? __ps2_command+0x372/0x7e0 [ 6.512516]
    __kasan_report.cold+0x7d/0x112 [ 6.512527] ? _raw_write_lock_irq+0x20/0xd0 [ 6.512539] ?
    __ps2_command+0x372/0x7e0 [ 6.512552] kasan_report+0x3c/0x50 [ 6.512564] __asan_load1+0x6a/0x70 [6.512575] __ps2_command+0x372/0x7e0 [ 6.512589] ? ps2_drain+0x240/0x240 [ 6.512601] ? dev_printk_emit+0xa2/0xd3 [ 6.512612] ? dev_vprintk_emit+0xc5/0xc5 [ 6.512621] ?
    __kasan_check_write+0x14/0x20 [ 6.512634] ? mutex_lock+0x8f/0xe0 [ 6.512643] ?
    __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x20/0x20 [ 6.512655] ps2_command+0x52/0x90 [ 6.512670] elantech_ps2_command+0x4f/0xc0 [psmouse] [ 6.512734] elantech_change_report_id+0x1e6/0x256 [psmouse] [6.512799] ? elantech_report_trackpoint.constprop.0.cold+0xd/0xd [psmouse] [ 6.512863] ? ps2_command+0x7f/0x90 [ 6.512877] elantech_query_info.cold+0x6bd/0x9ed [psmouse] [ 6.512943] ? elantech_setup_ps2+0x460/0x460 [psmouse] [ 6.513005] ? psmouse_reset+0x69/0xb0 [psmouse] [ 6.513064] ? psmouse_attr_set_helper+0x2a0/0x2a0 [psmouse] [ 6.513122] ? phys_pmd_init+0x30e/0x521 [ 6.513137] elantech_init+0x8a/0x200 [psmouse] [ 6.513200] ? elantech_init_ps2+0xf0/0xf0 [psmouse] [ 6.513249] ? elantech_query_info+0x440/0x440 [psmouse] [ 6.513296] ? synaptics_send_cmd+0x60/0x60 [psmouse] [ 6.513342] ? elantech_query_info+0x440/0x440 [psmouse] [ 6.513388] ? psmouse_try_protocol+0x11e/0x170 [psmouse] [6.513432] psmouse_extensions+0x65d/0x6e0 [psmouse] [ 6.513476] ? psmouse_try_protocol+0x170/0x170 [psmouse] [ 6.513519] ? mutex_unlock+0x22/0x40 [ 6.513526] ? ps2_command+0x7f/0x90 [ 6.513536] ? psmouse_probe+0xa3/0xf0 [psmouse] [ 6.513580] psmouse_switch_protocol+0x27d/0x2e0 [psmouse] [ 6.513624] psmouse_connect+0x272/0x530 [psmouse] [ 6.513669] serio_driver_probe+0x55/0x70 [ 6.513679] really_probe+0x190/0x720 [ 6.513689] driver_probe_device+0x160/0x1f0 [ 6.513697] device_driver_attach+0x119/0x130 [ 6.513705] ? device_driver_attach+0x130/0x130 [ 6.513713]
    __driver_attach+0xe7/0x1a0 [ 6.513720] ? device_driver_attach+0x130/0x130 [ 6.513728] bus_for_each_dev+0xfb/0x150 [ 6.513738] ? subsys_dev_iter_exit+0x10/0x10 [ 6.513748] ?
    _raw_write_unlock_bh+0x30/0x30 [ 6.513757] driver_attach+0x2d/0x40 [ 6.513764] serio_handle_event+0x199/0x3d0 [ 6.513775] process_one_work+0x471/0x740 [ 6.513785] worker_thread+0x2d2/0x790 [ 6.513794] ? process_one_work+0x740/0x740 [ 6.513802] kthread+0x1b4/0x1e0 [6.513809] ? set_kthread_struct+0x80/0x80 [ 6.513816] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [ 6.513832] The buggy address belongs to the page: [ 6.513838] page:00000000bc35e189 refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x1024d7 [ 6.513847] flags: 0x17ffffc0000000(node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0x1fffff) [ 6.513860] raw: 0 ---truncated--- (CVE-2021-47097)

  - 已解決 Linux 核心中的下列弱點：driver core: auxiliary bus: Fix memory leak when driver_register() fail If driver_register() returns with error we need to free the memory allocated for auxdrv->driver.name before returning from __auxiliary_driver_register() (CVE-2021-47287)

  - 已解決 Linux 核心中的下列弱點：ACPI: fix NULL pointer dereference Commit 71f642833284 (ACPI: utils: Fix reference counting in for_each_acpi_dev_match()) started doing acpi_dev_put() on a pointer that was possibly NULL. That fails miserably, because that helper inline function is not set up to handle that case. Just make acpi_dev_put() silently accept a NULL pointer, rather than calling down to put_device() with an invalid offset off that NULL pointer. (CVE-2021-47289)

  - 已解決 Linux 核心中的下列弱點：watchdog: Fix possible use-after-free by calling del_timer_sync() This driver's remove path calls del_timer(). However, that function does not wait until the timer handler finishes. This means that the timer handler may still be running after the driver's remove function has finished, which would result in a use-after-free. Fix by calling del_timer_sync(), which makes sure the timer handler has finished, and unable to re-schedule itself.
    (CVE-2021-47321)

  - 已解決 Linux 核心中的下列弱點：fbmem: Do not delete the mode that is still in use The execution of fb_delete_videomode() is not based on the result of the previous fbcon_mode_deleted(). As a result, the mode is directly deleted, regardless of whether it is still in use, which may cause UAF. ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in fb_mode_is_equal+0x36e/0x5e0 \ drivers/video/fbdev/core/modedb.c:924 Read of size 4 at addr ffff88807e0ddb1c by task syz-executor.0/18962 CPU: 2 PID: 18962 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.10.45-rc1+ #3 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS ... Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0x137/0x1be lib/dump_stack.c:118 print_address_description+0x6c/0x640 mm/kasan/report.c:385 __kasan_report mm/kasan/report.c:545 [inline] kasan_report+0x13d/0x1e0 mm/kasan/report.c:562 fb_mode_is_equal+0x36e/0x5e0 drivers/video/fbdev/core/modedb.c:924 fbcon_mode_deleted+0x16a/0x220 drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbcon.c:2746 fb_set_var+0x1e1/0xdb0 drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c:975 do_fb_ioctl+0x4d9/0x6e0 drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c:1108 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:48 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:753 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xfb/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:739 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Freed by task 18960: kasan_save_stack mm/kasan/common.c:48 [inline] kasan_set_track+0x3d/0x70 mm/kasan/common.c:56 kasan_set_free_info+0x17/0x30 mm/kasan/generic.c:355 __kasan_slab_free+0x108/0x140 mm/kasan/common.c:422 slab_free_hook mm/slub.c:1541 [inline] slab_free_freelist_hook+0xd6/0x1a0 mm/slub.c:1574 slab_free mm/slub.c:3139 [inline] kfree+0xca/0x3d0 mm/slub.c:4121 fb_delete_videomode+0x56a/0x820 drivers/video/fbdev/core/modedb.c:1104 fb_set_var+0x1f3/0xdb0 drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c:978 do_fb_ioctl+0x4d9/0x6e0 drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c:1108 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:48 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:753 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xfb/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:739 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 (CVE-2021-47338)

請注意，Nessus 並未測試這些問題，而是僅依據應用程式自我報告的版本號碼作出判斷。

遠端 Redhat Enterprise Linux 8 主機上安裝的多個套件受到 RHSA-2024:7000 公告中提及的多個弱點影響。

    核心套件中包含 Linux 核心，後者是任何 Linux 作業系統的核心。
    安全性修正：

     CVE-2023-6040 CVE-2024-26595 CVE-2024-26600 CVE-2021-46984 CVE-2023-52478 CVE-2023-52476 CVE-2023-52522 CVE-2021-47101 CVE-2021-47097 CVE-2023-52605 CVE-2024-26638 CVE-2024-26645 CVE-2024-26665 CVE-2024-26720 CVE-2024-26717 CVE-2024-26769 CVE-2024-26846 CVE-2024-26894 CVE-2024-26880 CVE-2024-26855 CVE-2024-26923 CVE-2024-26939 CVE-2024-27013 CVE-2024-27042 CVE-2024-35809 CVE-2023-52683 CVE-2024-35884 CVE-2024-35877 CVE-2024-35944 CVE-2024-35989 CVE-2021-47412 CVE-2021-47393 CVE-2021-47386 CVE-2021-47385 CVE-2021-47384 CVE-2021-47383 CVE-2021-47432 CVE-2021-47352 CVE-2021-47338 CVE-2021-47321 CVE-2021-47289 CVE-2021-47287 CVE-2023-52798 CVE-2023-52809 CVE-2023-52817 CVE-2023-52840 CVE-2023-52800 CVE-2021-47441 CVE-2021-47466 CVE-2021-47455 CVE-2021-47497 CVE-2021-47560 CVE-2021-47527 CVE-2024-36883 CVE-2024-36922 CVE-2024-36920 CVE-2024-36902 CVE-2024-36953 CVE-2024-36939 CVE-2024-36919 CVE-2024-36901 CVE-2021-47582 CVE-2021-47609 CVE-2024-38619 CVE-2022-48754 CVE-2022-48760 CVE-2024-38581 CVE-2024-38579 CVE-2024-38570 CVE-2024-38559 CVE-2024-38558 CVE-2024-37356 CVE-2024-39471 CVE-2024-39499 CVE-2024-39501 CVE-2024-39506 CVE-2024-40904 CVE-2024-40911 CVE-2024-40912 CVE-2024-40929 CVE-2024-40931 CVE-2024-40941 CVE-2024-40954 CVE-2024-40958 CVE-2024-40959 CVE-2024-40960 CVE-2024-40972 CVE-2024-40977 CVE-2024-40978 CVE-2024-40988 CVE-2024-40989 CVE-2024-40995 CVE-2024-40997 CVE-2024-40998 CVE-2024-41005 CVE-2024-40901 CVE-2024-41007 CVE-2024-41008 CVE-2022-48804 CVE-2022-48836 CVE-2022-48866 CVE-2024-41090 CVE-2024-41091 CVE-2024-41012 CVE-2024-41013 CVE-2024-41014 CVE-2024-41023 CVE-2024-41035 CVE-2024-41038 CVE-2024-41039 CVE-2024-41040 CVE-2024-41041 CVE-2024-41044 CVE-2024-41055 CVE-2024-41056 CVE-2024-41060 CVE-2024-41064 CVE-2024-41065 CVE-2024-41071 CVE-2024-41076 CVE-2024-41097 CVE-2024-42084 CVE-2024-42090 CVE-2024-42094 CVE-2024-42096 CVE-2024-42114 CVE-2024-42124 CVE-2024-42131 CVE-2024-42152 CVE-2024-42154 CVE-2024-42225 CVE-2024-42226 CVE-2024-42228 CVE-2024-42237 CVE-2024-42238 CVE-2024-42240 CVE-2024-42246 CVE-2024-42322 CVE-2024-43830 CVE-2024-43871 如需安全性問題的詳細資料，包括影響、CVSS 評分、致謝及其他相關資訊，請參閱〈參照〉一節列出的 CVE 頁面。

Tenable 已直接從 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 安全公告擷取前置描述區塊。

請注意，Nessus 並未測試這些問題，而是僅依據應用程式自我報告的版本號碼作出判斷。

Rocky Linux 8 主機已安裝的套件會受到 CIQ crlsa-2024_7000 公告中提及的多個弱點影響。

    CVE-2023-6040 CVE-2024-26595 CVE-2024-26600 CVE-2021-46984 CVE-2023-52478 CVE-2023-52476 CVE-2023-52522 CVE-2021-47101 CVE-2021-47097 CVE-2023-52605 CVE-2024-26638 CVE-2024-26645 CVE-2024-26665 CVE-2024-26720 CVE-2024-26717 CVE-2024-26769 CVE-2024-26846 CVE-2024-26894 CVE-2024-26880 CVE-2024-26855 CVE-2024-26923 CVE-2024-26939 CVE-2024-27013 CVE-2024-27042 CVE-2024-35809 CVE-2023-52683 CVE-2024-35884 CVE-2024-35877 CVE-2024-35944 CVE-2024-35989 CVE-2021-47412 CVE-2021-47393 CVE-2021-47386 CVE-2021-47385 CVE-2021-47384 CVE-2021-47383 CVE-2021-47432 CVE-2021-47352 CVE-2021-47338 CVE-2021-47321 CVE-2021-47289 CVE-2021-47287 CVE-2023-52798 CVE-2023-52809 CVE-2023-52817 CVE-2023-52840 CVE-2023-52800 CVE-2021-47441 CVE-2021-47466 CVE-2021-47455 CVE-2021-47497 CVE-2021-47560 CVE-2021-47527 CVE-2024-36883 CVE-2024-36922 CVE-2024-36920 CVE-2024-36902 CVE-2024-36953 CVE-2024-36939 CVE-2024-36919 CVE-2024-36901 CVE-2021-47582 CVE-2021-47609 CVE-2024-38619 CVE-2022-48754 CVE-2022-48760 CVE-2024-38581 CVE-2024-38579 CVE-2024-38570 CVE-2024-38559 CVE-2024-38558 CVE-2024-37356 CVE-2024-39471 CVE-2024-39499 CVE-2024-39501 CVE-2024-39506 CVE-2024-40904 CVE-2024-40911 CVE-2024-40912 CVE-2024-40929 CVE-2024-40931 CVE-2024-40941 CVE-2024-40954 CVE-2024-40958 CVE-2024-40959 CVE-2024-40960 CVE-2024-40972 CVE-2024-40977 CVE-2024-40978 CVE-2024-40988 CVE-2024-40989 CVE-2024-40995 CVE-2024-40997 CVE-2024-40998 CVE-2024-41005 CVE-2024-40901 CVE-2024-41007 CVE-2024-41008 CVE-2022-48804 CVE-2022-48836 CVE-2022-48866 CVE-2024-41090 CVE-2024-41091 CVE-2024-41012 CVE-2024-41013 CVE-2024-41014 CVE-2024-41023 CVE-2024-41035 CVE-2024-41038 CVE-2024-41039 CVE-2024-41040 CVE-2024-41041 CVE-2024-41044 CVE-2024-41055 CVE-2024-41056 CVE-2024-41060 CVE-2024-41064 CVE-2024-41065 CVE-2024-41071 CVE-2024-41076 CVE-2024-41097 CVE-2024-42084 CVE-2024-42090 CVE-2024-42094 CVE-2024-42096 CVE-2024-42114 CVE-2024-42124 CVE-2024-42131 CVE-2024-42152 CVE-2024-42154 CVE-2024-42225 CVE-2024-42226 CVE-2024-42228 CVE-2024-42237 CVE-2024-42238 CVE-2024-42240 CVE-2024-42246 CVE-2024-42322 CVE-2024-43830 CVE-2024-43871

Tenable 已直接從 CIQ 安全性公告中擷取上述描述區塊。

請注意，Nessus 並未測試這些問題，而是僅依據應用程式自我報告的版本號碼作出判斷。

遠端 AlmaLinux 8 主機中安裝的套件受到 ALSA-2024:7000 公告中提及的多個弱點影響。

    CVE-2023-6040 CVE-2024-26595 CVE-2024-26600 CVE-2021-46984 CVE-2023-52478 CVE-2023-52476 CVE-2023-52522 CVE-2021-47101 CVE-2021-47097 CVE-2023-52605 CVE-2024-26638 CVE-2024-26645 CVE-2024-26665 CVE-2024-26720 CVE-2024-26717 CVE-2024-26769 CVE-2024-26846 CVE-2024-26894 CVE-2024-26880 CVE-2024-26855 CVE-2024-26923 CVE-2024-26939 CVE-2024-27013 CVE-2024-27042 CVE-2024-35809 CVE-2023-52683 CVE-2024-35884 CVE-2024-35877 CVE-2024-35944 CVE-2024-35989 CVE-2021-47412 CVE-2021-47393 CVE-2021-47386 CVE-2021-47385 CVE-2021-47384 CVE-2021-47383 CVE-2021-47432 CVE-2021-47352 CVE-2021-47338 CVE-2021-47321 CVE-2021-47289 CVE-2021-47287 CVE-2023-52798 CVE-2023-52809 CVE-2023-52817 CVE-2023-52840 CVE-2023-52800 CVE-2021-47441 CVE-2021-47466 CVE-2021-47455 CVE-2021-47497 CVE-2021-47560 CVE-2021-47527 CVE-2024-36883 CVE-2024-36922 CVE-2024-36920 CVE-2024-36902 CVE-2024-36953 CVE-2024-36939 CVE-2024-36919 CVE-2024-36901 CVE-2021-47582 CVE-2021-47609 CVE-2024-38619 CVE-2022-48754 CVE-2022-48760 CVE-2024-38581 CVE-2024-38579 CVE-2024-38570 CVE-2024-38559 CVE-2024-38558 CVE-2024-37356 CVE-2024-39471 CVE-2024-39499 CVE-2024-39501 CVE-2024-39506 CVE-2024-40904 CVE-2024-40911 CVE-2024-40912 CVE-2024-40929 CVE-2024-40931 CVE-2024-40941 CVE-2024-40954 CVE-2024-40958 CVE-2024-40959 CVE-2024-40960 CVE-2024-40972 CVE-2024-40977 CVE-2024-40978 CVE-2024-40988 CVE-2024-40989 CVE-2024-40995 CVE-2024-40997 CVE-2024-40998 CVE-2024-41005 CVE-2024-40901 CVE-2024-41007 CVE-2024-41008 CVE-2022-48804 CVE-2022-48836 CVE-2022-48866 CVE-2024-41090 CVE-2024-41091 CVE-2024-41012 CVE-2024-41013 CVE-2024-41014 CVE-2024-41023 CVE-2024-41035 CVE-2024-41038 CVE-2024-41039 CVE-2024-41040 CVE-2024-41041 CVE-2024-41044 CVE-2024-41055 CVE-2024-41056 CVE-2024-41060 CVE-2024-41064 CVE-2024-41065 CVE-2024-41071 CVE-2024-41076 CVE-2024-41097 CVE-2024-42084 CVE-2024-42090 CVE-2024-42094 CVE-2024-42096 CVE-2024-42114 CVE-2024-42124 CVE-2024-42131 CVE-2024-42152 CVE-2024-42154 CVE-2024-42225 CVE-2024-42226 CVE-2024-42228 CVE-2024-42237 CVE-2024-42238 CVE-2024-42240 CVE-2024-42246 CVE-2024-42322 CVE-2024-43830 CVE-2024-43871

Tenable 已直接從 AlmaLinux 安全公告擷取前置描述區塊。

請注意，Nessus 並未測試這些問題，而是僅依據應用程式自我報告的版本號碼作出判斷。

Linux/Unix 主機上安裝了一個或多個受到弱點影響的套件，且供應商未提供可用的修補程式。

  - 在 Linux 核心中，已解決下列弱點： wifi: ath11k: fix dfs radar event locking The ath11k active pdevs are protected by RCU but the DFS radar event handling code calling ath11k_mac_get_ar_by_pdev_id() was not marked as a read-side critical section. Mark the code in question as an RCU read-side critical section to avoid any potential use-after-free issues. Compile tested only.
    (CVE-2023-52798)

請注意，Nessus 依賴供應商報告的套件存在。

AlmaLinux 9.2 主機已安裝的套件會受到 TuxCare ALMALINUX9.2：CLSA-2026：1781347338 公告中提及的多個弱點影響。

  - 已解決 Linux 核心中的下列弱點：net: mdio: unexport __init-annotated mdio_bus_init() EXPORT_SYMBOL and __init is a bad combination because the .init.text section is freed up after the initialization. Hence, modules cannot use symbols annotated __init. The access to a freed symbol may end up with kernel panic. modpost used to detect it, but it has been broken for a decade. Recently, I fixed modpost so it started to warn it again, then this showed up in linux-next builds. There are two ways to fix it: - Remove __init - Remove EXPORT_SYMBOL I chose the latter for this case because the only in-tree call-site, drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c is never compiled as modular. (CONFIG_PHYLIB is boolean) (CVE-2022-49350)

  - 已解決 Linux 核心中的下列弱點：selinux: fix memleak in security_read_state_kernel() In this function, it directly returns the result of __security_read_policy without freeing the allocated memory in *data, cause memory leak issue, so free the memory if
    __security_read_policy failed. [PM: subject line tweak] (CVE-2022-50201)

  - 已解決 Linux 核心中的下列弱點：usb: typec: tcpci: fix of node refcount leak in tcpci_register_port() I got the following report while doing device(mt6370-tcpc) load test with CONFIG_OF_UNITTEST and CONFIG_OF_DYNAMIC enabled: OF: ERROR: memory leak, expected refcount 1 instead of 2, of_node_get()/of_node_put() unbalanced - destroy cset entry: attach overlay node /i2c/pmic@34/tcpc/connector The 'fwnode' set in tcpci_parse_config() which is called in tcpci_register_port(), its node refcount is increased in device_get_named_child_node(). It needs be put while exiting, so call fwnode_handle_put() in the error path of tcpci_register_port() and in tcpci_unregister_port() to avoid leak. (CVE-2022-50246)

  - 已解決 Linux 核心中的下列弱點：drivers: serial: jsm: fix some leaks in probe This error path needs to unwind instead of just returning directly. (CVE-2022-50312)

  - 已解決 Linux 核心中的下列弱點：thermal: intel_powerclamp: Use get_cpu() instead of smp_processor_id() to avoid crash When CPU 0 is offline and intel_powerclamp is used to inject idle, it generates kernel BUG: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code:
    bash/15687 caller is debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20 CPU: 4 PID: 15687 Comm: bash Not tainted 5.19.0-rc7+ #57 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x49/0x63 dump_stack+0x10/0x16 check_preemption_disabled+0xdd/0xe0 debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20 powerclamp_set_cur_state+0x7f/0xf9 [intel_powerclamp] ... ... Here CPU 0 is the control CPU by default and changed to the current CPU, if CPU 0 offlined. This check has to be performed under cpus_read_lock(), hence the above warning. Use get_cpu() instead of smp_processor_id() to avoid this BUG. [ rjw: Subject edits ] (CVE-2022-50494)

請注意，Nessus 並未測試這些問題，而是僅依據應用程式自我報告的版本號碼作出判斷。

ID	名稱	產品	系列	已發布	已更新	嚴重性
292346	MiracleLinux 8kernel-4.18.0-553.22.1.el8_10 (AXSA:2024-9035:37)	Nessus	Miracle Linux Local Security Checks	2026/1/20	2026/3/24	high
207773	Oracle Linux 8：kernel (ELSA-2024-7000)	Nessus	Oracle Linux Local Security Checks	2024/9/25	2026/3/24	high
366944	CentOS Linux 8 [TuxCare] 安全性更新：bpftool / kernel / kernel-core / kernel-cross-headers / etc多個漏洞（CENTOS-STREAM8：CLSA-2024：1727815919）	Nessus	CentOS Local Security Checks	2026/10/18	2026/10/18	high
207683	RHEL 8：核心 (RHSA-2024:7000)	Nessus	Red Hat Local Security Checks	2024/9/24	2026/3/24	high
358781	Rocky Linux 8 [CIQ] 安全性更新：bpftool / bpftool-debuginfo / kernel / kernel-abi-stablelists / etc 多個弱點（crlsa-2024_7000）	Nessus	Rocky Linux Local Security Checks	2026/10/1	2026/10/1	high
207758	AlmaLinux 8：kernel (ALSA-2024:7000)	Nessus	Alma Linux Local Security Checks	2024/9/25	2026/3/24	high
225912	Linux Distros 未修補弱點：CVE-2023-52798	Nessus	Misc.	2025/3/5	2026/10/29	high
360826	AlmaLinux 9.2 [TuxCare] 安全性更新：bpftool / kernel / kernel-64k / kernel-64k-core / kernel-64k-debug / etc 多個弱點（ALMALINUX9.2：CLSA-2026：1781347338）	Nessus	Alma Linux Local Security Checks	2026/10/1	2026/10/19	high

偵測

搜尋 Plugin

high

high

high

high

high

high

high

high